- 59
- 14
I’m writing a cosmology that contains infinite amount of universes ( it is a 5D space containing an infinite amount of 4DSTC ). An infinite amount are the same as ours, another infinite amount of them has minuscule to massive differences to our own etc.
But, I was told that the “physics” must remain the same. And then, the opposite from another source.
This is a problem because being limited to all universes having the same physics sounds creatively restricting. I want to write short stories about French fry people, places where 2 equals 7, atoms are replaced by lasagna etc….
I want to hear this community’s opinion. Does breaking physics automatically mean that the cosmology is considered a type 4 multiverse?
For mine, I don’t believe so because… my cosmology is contained in a 5D space so, no universe can exceed 5 dimensions in any form so…
that means no absolute infinity, infinite dimensions, no mathematical universe etc.
I want my 5D cosmology to contain quite literally everything possible…just minus that none of the universes can exceed 5 dimensions.
What do you think?
But, I was told that the “physics” must remain the same. And then, the opposite from another source.
This is a problem because being limited to all universes having the same physics sounds creatively restricting. I want to write short stories about French fry people, places where 2 equals 7, atoms are replaced by lasagna etc….
I want to hear this community’s opinion. Does breaking physics automatically mean that the cosmology is considered a type 4 multiverse?
For mine, I don’t believe so because… my cosmology is contained in a 5D space so, no universe can exceed 5 dimensions in any form so…
that means no absolute infinity, infinite dimensions, no mathematical universe etc.
I want my 5D cosmology to contain quite literally everything possible…just minus that none of the universes can exceed 5 dimensions.
What do you think?
