- 751
- 398
I think his lifting strength should be Galactic with spatial manipulation. Those planets were bigger than some of the galaxies there.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Minor Zeno CRT
- Thread starter RisingIons
- Start date
-
- Tags
- dragon ball zen'ō
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #2
Bump
- 842
- 256
Disagree. Animation often can be deceiving. Those planets are just regular sized.
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #5
??????????? They’re occupying the same space, there’s nothing deceptive about it. You wouldn’t even see a planet in the same space as a galaxy unless the galaxy is massively down scaled.
The scan from actual space
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
makes sense, I agree
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #7
Actually that second scan might even call for multi-galactic.
- 842
- 256
The planets are zoomed in. Their true size is not shown here correctly. You can't scale these planets to 3-C size just with this animation angle. Unless there is evidence that these planets are not normal and are actually 3-C sized. Unless you have any concrete evidence, you are making a huge assumption.??????????? They’re occupying the same space, there’s nothing deceptive about it. You wouldn’t even see a planet in the same space as a galaxy unless the galaxy is massively down scaled.
The scan from actual space
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
the green planet seems to be further away than one of the galaxies
- 842
- 256
Whenever zeno dostroys a planet through spatial manipulation, the planet in the universe also get destroyed too. Unless you have any evidence that the planets in DB universes are 3-C sized, I doubt that this revision is getting passed.
- 3,708
- 1,759
Unless you have an argument that shows the galaxies being smaller than a planet
plus, we have a planet with three starts, other planets with 10x gravity of earth. is there any reason those planets can't be bigger than galaxies besides they can't because it's impossible for an unknown reason
- 842
- 256
So lets upgrade frieza to 3-C then. And i am not the one who claimed about 3-C sized planets it was OP and you guys who support him. So it is you who needs evidence not me.
- 3,708
- 1,759
Why? Those planets were bigger than galaxies because we see them bigger than galaxies.
Not every random planet is bigger than a galaxy
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
not because some planets are galaxy sized means every planet is galaxy sized
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
there really is something that doesn't feel right for me if those planets were normal size, but I can't really tell what it is
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #18
Heaven is a planet as wide as the universe and here we are arguing about galaxy sized planets.
- 842
- 256
Heaven is also located in the afterlife. There is no evidence that the planets contained inside the mortal universe are any bigger than IRL universe.
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #20
Imagine being given evidence and not accepting the evidence as evidence. I don’t understand.
- 3,708
- 1,759
I mean except that the video show us planets being in the same size department as galaxies
but we'll pretend we didn't see that
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
I just looked at the scene, I feel like I just need to do some pixel scaling to see if those planets are close to galaxy sized
you will see the planets "moving" as the camera moves, which doesn't seem to happen with the galaxies
you will see the planets "moving" as the camera moves, which doesn't seem to happen with the galaxies
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
ok, so the galaxies didn't move at all, which means they should be much further away
- 842
- 256
It is just animations. You need an official statement about galaxy sized planet in order for this upgrade to be viable.
- 3,708
- 1,759
No not really actually. That's like saying you need official statements of planet earth in fiction to be as the same size of ours.
There is another shot were all pplanted and galaxies are besides each other, I think it's on the near end
Tho I really don't care if this gets accepted or not
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 6,005
“Oh look, a Galaxy sized monster! He can’t be Galaxy level because he needs to be stated to be Galaxy sized” is what you are trying to say. Bruh
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
I can't find it
- 13,897
- 5,395
tbh this is confusing since it could either mean the galaxy is small, the planet is large, or the galaxy is simply just far away
and because of that, I kinda doubt that they would just insert a planet being larger than a galaxy for no reason really, so I'm gonna have to go with a no on this one
especially cause of this
add me to the disagrees ig
and because of that, I kinda doubt that they would just insert a planet being larger than a galaxy for no reason really, so I'm gonna have to go with a no on this one
especially cause of this
add me to the disagrees ig
- 3,708
- 1,759
It's on frame 43 sec, you can see a galaxy being between/under a planet
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #30
Excerpt from the video. Also regardless, I don't think it changes the fact that a galaxy appears on his spatial manipulation device, so he should be able to move them. I also don't see what kind of forced perspective can make a galaxy and planet appear in the same shot. The sun is 109 times larger than the Earth in radius and a galaxy contains a very high number of stars which are largely unviewable individually from a distance.
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
fair enough
Excerpt from the video. Also regardless, I don't think it changes the fact that a galaxy appears on his spatial manipulation device, so he should be able to move them. I also don't see what kind of forced perspective can make a galaxy and planet appear in the same shot. The sun is 109 times larger than the Earth in radius and a galaxy contains a very high number of stars which are largely unviewable individually from a distance.
- 13,897
- 5,395
that's a good justification actually yeah
makes sense
- 850
- 350
Also agree with this
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #35
Lol planet sized planets confirmed
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
nice, though the problem is that the scaling will need to be changed a lot knowing this
- 751
- 398
- Thread starter
- #37
How so?
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
I was just joking
- 3,708
- 1,759
Stop making fun of meh! I Will my dad, he is a lawyer and he will sue you!
I meant planet sized galaxies, but hopefully the scan was good
- 3,708
- 1,759
Just changing his LS or maybe ap too
altho the way he destroys them looks like hakai/deconstruction
Similar threads
