• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Make Arnos Great Again (MAGA) - Time and Traces

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
3,862
Reaction score
2,175
Happy Pacha (easter) everyone, may God bless you all

This thread will not only just talking about hypertimeline but also for make every trace are low 2C by it nature

Hypertimeline
There are two reason for get hypertimeline:

  • By our standard, we consider time as higher D by default because it can contain uncountable infinite verison of spatial object. This make the whole timeline more bigger infinite than just a infinite size universe
The relationship between the spatial dimensions of a universe and the additional temporal dimension(s) may be visualized as something akin to the frames of a movie placed side-by-side. Basically, the time-like direction may be thought of as a line comprised of uncountably infinitely many points, each of which is a static "snapshot" of the whole universe at any given moment, with the set of all such events comprising the totality of spacetime.

This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A).
Hypertimeline basically use the same logic, where the default timeline that are 4D can be contained inside a frame of another timeline, that mean this timeline can contain uncountable infinite version of 4D by it nature​

  • Making something as infinitesimal thing inside something. Our standard say, something can be higher D if it make an object as infinitesimal part compare to it as a whole
One of the more straightforward ways to qualify for Tier 2 and up through higher dimensions is by affecting whole higher-dimensional universes which can embed the whole of lower-dimensional ones within themselves. For example: A cosmology where the entirety of our 3-dimensional universe is in fact a subset of a much greater 4-dimensional space, or generalizations of this same scenario to higher numbers of dimensions; i.e A cosmology where the four-dimensional spacetime continuum is just the infinitesimal surface of a 5-dimensional object, and etc.
The gap between each frames inside a timeline are consider as an instant or a point that seperating two states/frames of the world. Instant also an infinitesimal interval in time. Soo we can say each frames are a infinitesimal part of the whole timeline. Hypertimeline make a default timeline that are 4D as a infinitesimal part of it​

In Maou, time keeper can accelerate time to an infinite years in an instant. This must make the timeline that contained it in it instant a hypertimeline if we use the same logic above. This blog will explain further about hypertimeline
「永劫(えいごう)の時に飲まれて消えよ」
"Be swallowed by eternity and vanish."
白銀の光が俺を包み、時が加速する。十億年————百億年————否、永劫(えいどう)の時が一瞬のうちに重ねられる。いかに魔王の体と言えど、無限の時を生き延びることはできない。やがては朽ち、消え果てる 。
The silver light surrounds me, time shall accelerate. Billion years, ten billion years. No. Eternity (of time) passing in an instant. Even the body of the demon king can't survive in endless time. It will eventually collapse and vanish.
光が弾(はじ)けると同時に、永劫(えいごう)の時を経た体は消滅し、死に絶えた。
The light shines. At the same time, the body of the demon king, having passed through eternity, has vanished and perished.
「フ......フフフフ、フハハハハハッ!! どうだ?どうだ、思い知ったか、愚かな、始祖よ。運命は変えられぬ。我が不死身となった時点で、否、二千年前、そなたが戦いから逃げた時点で、今日こうなることは決まっていたのだ!!」
"HA HA HA HA!! How was that? Now you understand, foolish ancestor. You can't change fate. From the moment I became immortal, No. 2000 years ago, when you chose to run away, what happens today was already decided at that moment!!

~ WN, translated by Marosuke
"It was not infinite amount of time, it just a very very long time"​
Well the infinite amount of time is mentioned 4 times in the scan, so it is very very unlikely for it to not mean infinite but just a long time. Specially since it is power of keeper of time.​


Trace of the Land of Traces
Like the standard says what we consider as timeline are those which have infinite amount of time by it nature, or separated by an infinite amount of time from other timeline. Read the blog about hypertimeline for more clear explanation about this.

Land of traces basically contain all traces that are the past of all things, all things that already happen, every record and memory. All traces from the very beginning of time it self
"The farther we go, the further back in time we get, right?" Sasha asked, looking at Arcana in confusion. "How far does this go exactly?"

"All traces return as far as the beginning of time. That is where the God of Traces resides."

"You mean we're traveling to the beginning of the world?"

Arcana nodded. "That is correct."
~ LN vol 6 chp 27, official translation
We were in an unfamiliar place-a never-ending wasteland with no sign of life. A dome covered the sky above, and polar night cloaked the land in darkness.

Arcana was beside me. Both she and I were clothed. Was this the God of Traces' dream?

"This is both my dream and hers. I am Revalschned, God of Traces. I govern the order of this world's records and memories, and inscribe their traces into my body."
~ LN vol 6 chp 28 , official translation
I looked to the side to see Golroana appear in the same praying pose. The source I had shredded was completely unharmed. "You distorted time," I said, looking into the abyss.

"Indeed. In the land of traces, there is no future. My devout follower's life is carved into the past, so he will never die."

"He will if I deal with you first."

"Indeed. But I, too, am undying. As the order of traces, I am the past of everything in existence. You can rewrite time all you wish, but the past that existed won't change."

As the order of the records and memories, the God of Traces was the past itself. Destroying him would require altering the past, but there was little chance of that happening against the god of such an order, even with time magic.

Revalschned existed here. That truth could never be changed. This was what made the God of Traces immortal and was the reason Ceris had wanted to destroy him while he was still asleep.
~ LN vol 6 chp 38, official translation
The traces or past itself doesn't stick to each other but are pile up/stacked upon/build on one by one, this makes the nature of timeline in MGnF explicitly explained not as a stick linear timeline but as a timeline that make up by many snapshots or frames. So past or traces here are showed as a frame or snapshot that already happen within the timeline
"The past isn't something to be fixed upon, but something to build on.The countless traces accumulated from the past were what allowed me to take a step forward and create Gilieriam Naviem."

Having witnessed me crushing the supposedly indestructible land of traces underfoot, Golroana was no longer able to ignore my words.

"As long as you do nothing but pray, Revalschned's power remains nothing but a trace of the past," I said. "You won't be able to surpass the answers accumulated by your ancestors and arrive at a better solution beyond them."
~LN vol 6 chp 39, official translation
「過去は固執するものではない。積み重ねていくものだ。過去の積み重ねが、その数多の痕跡が、俺に新たな一歩を踏み出させ、<涅槃七歩征服ギ(リエリアム・ナヴィエム)>が生まれた」
"The past is not something to cling to, but something that pile up. These experiences of past, countless traces pushed me to the new step, <涅槃七歩征服ギ(リエリアム・ナヴィエム)> came into existence."
~WN, translated by Marosuke
Note: I manipulate change the translation of "to gain experience" here for making the context more clear. And i already ask Marosuke if that can be translated as "pile up" and he say yes
Every traces are contained inside a pages in a book and the books contained inside a bookshelves that strached across the infinite land of traces

So the traces have a fixed "size" inside the land of traces there are no bigger and smaller traces, all of them are nothing more than just a mere book compare to the endlessness of the land of traces
"Gilieriam Naviem."

It was enhancement magic that momentarily raised my strength and released the destructive magic condensed in my source. I slowly walked towards the God of Traces. All I had to do was walk.

On my first step, all the bookshelves stretched across the land collapsed, sending all the books recording the traces of the world into the air. Each page that opened had a trace of this world written on it. The shadows of countless people appeared in the wasteland and then vanished, destroyed by my footstep.

On my second step, the books in the air tore apart, scattering their pages everywhere. Groups of various animals appeared on the water while birds and dragons filled the skies. Then the traces of all living creatures were crushed under my foot and destroyed.

On my third step, the land shook, and the scattered pages burst. The dome vanished, and the sky appeared, followed by the sun, the moon, and the stars. Their shadows all disappeared under my step, banished beyond the skies.

On my fourth step, the torn scraps of paper disintegrated. The land cracked into pieces, lakes dried up, and all plant life withered away.

On my fifth step, countless bookshelves rose once again, recording the traces of destruction until now. The bookshelves shook violently before being crushed into pieces. Broken by my footstep, the shattered sky flickered overhead.

On my sixth step, there was nothing left in the land of traces as it shook. The only light left before me was crushed by my footstep, enclosing the world in darkness.

On my seventh step, I froze before bringing my foot down. The land of traces had vanished, and I was back in the room with the stone floor. If I had finished taking my seventh step, I would have destroyed the world a thousand times over.


"Hmm. I made this spell with the intent of conquering the land of traces in seven steps, but it seems I've failed. If I had taken seven steps, nothing would remain."

The land of traces had reached its limits at the sixth step, unable to record any more traces of destruction. The divine realm had broken down. I canceled Gilieriam Naviem and set my foot on the floor.

"That can't be..." Despite seeing it with his own eyes, Golroana trembled in disbelief. "The land of traces... The infinite world created by the gods..." he mumbled in a daze.

~LN vol 6 chp 38, official translation

So why trace must be low 2C by its nature?
The reason is that the acceleration of time to eternity happened in the past, so logically that must be a trace because land of traces contains the past of everything, everything that happen in the past are considered as traces. This making a trace able to contain infinite amount of time by it own nature

Conclusion

  • Hypertimeline for Maou Gakuin making everyone that can destroy entire world to low 1C
  • Making everyone that affect at least one traces to low 2C
 
Preempting events, as I know that the last thread was filled with memes and off-topic comments, it would be appreciated if you would only comment about the current proposal, I have no opinion at the moment as I am going to sleep and it's not like I understand Hypertimeline standards so I'm likely not interested in this yet.

On side note, I'm deleting any comment that's not related to the thread or has any meme on it.
 
Would it be possible to link the last thread in the CRT to make it clear the new arguments and counterarguments?
 
By the latest admission, there is no such thing as hypertimeline as a construct based on the standards.
If you think something is low 1-C based on the way time works, it needs to be argued for as an extra dimension of time not a hypertimeline.
 
By the latest admission, there is no such thing as hypertimeline as a construct based on the standards.
If you think something is low 1-C based on the way time works, it needs to be argued for as an extra dimension of time not a hypertimeline.
Wasn’t that thread rejected? I don’t see how that’s relevant here if that was rejected. As for my vote, I have no stance, so just put me in Neutral.
 
Wasn’t that thread rejected? I don’t see how that’s relevant here if that was rejected. As for my vote, I have no stance, so just put me in Neutral.
Please read it, the conclusion of it is that there is no such thing as hypertimeline.
I.e. if the thread was passed then yes you can try and use hypertimeline to get low 1-C, but it was rejected and agreed that there is no hypertimeline.
It still the same standard when i read the FaQ
There is no hypertimeline standard in the FAQ, what we have is an addition time dimension, which is what you can argue for and not hypertimeline. Hence what I said in my first post in this thread.
Why are you using a rejected thread
Like i said above, It is just about 35 messages, please read it.
 
There is no hypertimeline standard in the FAQ, what we have is an addition time dimension, which is what you can argue for and not hypertimeline. Hence what I said in my first post in this thread.
Well... hypertimeline, overeaching timeline, extended timeline, name it whaterver you want. The essence is basically the same as why time is by default 4D, because it contain the 3D inside infinitesimall point of it self. We just change the 3D to 4D here. You doesnt need direct statement as absolute proof
Aside from direct statements, the easiest way to confirm that the line is comprised of uncountably infinitely many points/"snapshots" is to show that the development of the timelines is time-like.
 
I can see the logic behind it, but since I don't have much knowledge of Hypertimeline and I'm not sure if VBW accepts it, I consider myself neutral.
 
By the latest admission, there is no such thing as hypertimeline as a construct based on the standards.
If you think something is low 1-C based on the way time works, it needs to be argued for as an extra dimension of time not a hypertimeline.
That thread was rejected, please don't try using it as if it's accepted information (a "hypertimeline" is how people describe a cosmology with another time dimension)
 
Well... hypertimeline, overeaching timeline, extended timeline, name it whaterver you want. The essence is basically the same as why time is by default 4D, because it contain the 3D inside infinitesimall point of it self. We just change the 3D to 4D here. You doesnt need direct statement as absolute proof
I said exactly this, no you don't need any statement as what you need is feat that it is a low 1-C construct. What I am saying is hypertimeline is made up and not a word officially recognized here as a standard in the wiki.
That thread was rejected, please don't try using it as if it's accepted information (a "hypertimeline" is how people describe a cosmology with another time dimension)
I honestly feel like no one reads anymore and they just want to argue.
There is no hypertimeline standard in the FAQ, what we have is an addition time dimension, which is what you can argue for and not hypertimeline. Hence what I said in my first post in this thread.
If you think something is low 1-C based on the way time works, it needs to be argued for as an extra dimension of time not a hypertimeline
That was the conclusion of the thread and which you would know if you read it.
The point is his OP is filled with hypertimeline shenanigans and the fact was the thread was rejected cause knowledgeable staff agreed that there is no hypertimeline. And like I said you can argue for low 1-C without using made up terms.
 
I said exactly this, no you don't need any statement as what you need is feat that it is a low 1-C construct. What I am saying is hypertimeline is made up and not a word officially recognized here as a standard in the wiki.

I honestly feel like no one reads anymore and they just want to argue.


That was the conclusion of the thread and which you would know if you read it.
The point is his OP is filled with hypertimeline shenanigans and the fact was the thread was rejected cause knowledgeable staff agreed that there is no hypertimeline. And like I said you can argue for low 1-C without using made up terms.
It's just an easy way of referring to a structure with more than one time dimension, so yes, the term does in fact exist regardless of what you're saying. No matter how much you wanna yap about "people just want to argue, no one reads anymore," it doesn't make what I said any less true
 
It's just an easy way of referring to a structure with more than one time dimension, so yes, the term does in fact exist regardless of what you're saying. No matter how much you wanna yap about "people just want to argue, no one reads anymore," it doesn't make what I said any less true
It makes this untrue
That thread was rejected, please don't try using it as if it's accepted information
As I rightly pointed out to the OP that by our latest admission we said Hypertimeline is made up and not something official by our standard.
So how exactly is that using a rejected thread as accepted information? Literally I was pointing out that my thread trying to make hypertimeline a thing was rejected. So yes, you really just want to have something to say and nothing more.
 
How many times has this been rejected?
Technically, none since the previous one was requested to be closed by OP due to being busy IRL. Also, this one is trying to upgrade traces rather than repeating the hypertimeline arguments again.
 
There seems to be several issues with the OP arguement than one for me to outright disagree;
  1. It's just accelerating Anos time not entire Universal space, which is insignificant in size.
  2. Instant does not mean infinitesimal, not here bydefault atleast, Agnaa once said it is 1 second by default unless more context to its actual meaning.
  3. It just seems like standard time manipulation and shouldn’t be extrapolated to determine the entirety of cosmology unless explicitly stated.
So yeah. Disagree.
 
Went back and forth with OP offsite, and I disagree. Just to summarize my points:
  • Accelerating Anos' time to experience infinity doesn’t inherently make the timeline 5D as it’s still happening within 4D Timeline.
  • Experiencing an infinite number of moments within an instant is an extreme case of time dilation or acceleration, not the creation of a higher temporal dimension.
  • You can have multiple Timelines within a singular timeline and still be 4D.
 
You suppose to agree with this
It's just accelerating Anos time not entire Universal space, which is insignificant in size.
It was not insignificant btw if our context is about time structure, i mean the space is irrelevant

The main argument here are a 4D thing being infinitesimall inside some structure. This is not about space structure but about time structure, even if it was just a human body for the space, if we look from the time structure it still mean infinite amount of time contained by a timeline

Instant does not mean infinitesimal, not here bydefault atleast, Agnaa once said it is 1 second by default unless more context to its actual meaning.
Well it say a "single instant", 1 seconds doesnt a "single" because it consist some mili seconds. The one that literally single in time is just the actual instant

And the keeper literally approch arnos in practically 0 second (it was the same event btw), soo it was not 1 second but the actual instant. Soo yes instant in maou mean infinitesimal interval in time
It just seems like standard time manipulation and shouldn’t be extrapolated to determine the entirety of cosmology unless explicitly stated.
Yeah it was time manipulation, but there are not standard that say time manipulation cannot making a hypertimeline

.
.

The main argument was the keeper can add infinite amount of time but still inside an instant of some timeline, making that timeline is capable of holding the entirety of timeline inside it infiniteisimall point
 
Went back and forth with OP offsite, and I disagree. Just to summarize my points:
  • Accelerating Anos' time to experience infinity doesn’t inherently make the timeline 5D as it’s still happening within 4D Timeline.
  • Experiencing an infinite number of moments within an instant is an extreme case of time dilation or acceleration, not the creation of a higher temporal dimension.
  • You can have multiple Timelines within a singular timeline and still be 4D.
Mhmhm
  • Well the keeper adding time inside time by accelerating time. A 4D object or a time, the entirety of time, contained inside infinitesimal part of other time, this automatically make the "other time" are 5D
  • Infinite number of seconds not moments, because each seconds consist uncountable infinite number of moments. Well adding the entirety of timeline inside an infinitesimall part of timeline, is prove that timeline are higher temporal dimension
  • You cannot have multiple timelines inside a single timeline bro, like you cannot have a 2C structure yet remain low 2C structure, it was impossible. The context here is not about multiverse, the multiverse contain the timelines inside it spatial structure, and their timeline have the same lenght there are no timeline that contained by a infinitesimall point of another timeline. The context is about time structure a line of time cannot contain a entirety of another line of time inside infinitesimall point of it self yet remain the same structure, it must be a bigger and higher structure of time
 
I'm not really seeing anything about time being slowed down to this extent as any form of indication for hypertimelines given their very strict standards in general, gonna have to disagree here.
 
I'm not really seeing anything about time being slowed down to this extent as any form of indication for hypertimelines given their very strict standards in general, gonna have to disagree here.
But it not being slowed down, like i say above the whole timeline being added inside a single instant of other timeline
 
your opinion will be appreciated here.
This isn't a hyper timeline because time flow in the same direction is every scenario
Things like timelines having time that passes at different rates would not qualify, as even the theory of general relativity already establishes that with just one regular time dimension time can flow at different rates in different places. Time flowing backwards in another universe would also not qualify it to have an additional time dimension, as it would still use the same directions of past and future as regular time, just with events playing out in reverse. For the same reasons, statements about independent time streams or of separate kinds of time, which could flow parallel to the original time, would not qualify.
Neither would dimensions that are timeless voids or are described as beyond spacetime in general qualify. Unless they contradict themselves, these realms should not have a time dimension at all, with change in them happening according to other principles. If they, on the other hand, do contradict themselves, the statement of them not having regular time would inherently not be reliable, making the idea equally unusable.

The OP is attempting to argue a higher dimensional realm but it using incorrect logic behind it.

The blog itself is also just misunderstanding what a double timeflow in the same realm would result in. Time flowing in different rates, even an infinitely different rates, would still involve only a single temporal dimension.

There's possibly an argument for a 5D higher dimensional space, but it would be for an uncountable infinite number of universes than anything to do with a timeline in my view.
 
This isn't a hyper timeline because time flow in the same direction is every scenario


The OP is attempting to argue a higher dimensional realm but it using incorrect logic behind it.

The blog itself is also just misunderstanding what a double timeflow in the same realm would result in. Time flowing in different rates, even an infinitely different rates, would still involve only a single temporal dimension.

There's possibly an argument for a 5D higher dimensional space, but it would be for an uncountable infinite number of universes than anything to do with a timeline in my view.
Well the thing i want to argue is a whole timeline inside a infinitesimall (instant) of another timeline

The time flow but seperated by an infinite amount of seconds was just to prove the timeline inside the hypertimeline was a whole default timeline, that this timeline was only infinitesimal part of hypertimeline
 
Well the thing i want to argue is a whole timeline inside a infinitesimall (instant) of another timeline

The time flow but seperated by an infinite amount of seconds was just to prove the timeline inside the hypertimeline was a whole default timeline, that this timeline was only infinitesimal part of hypertimeline
Blackholes generate an infinite timeline within space time without causing a second temporal axis to exist. The directional flow of time is the biggest factor and they're using the same direction in all those cases.
 
Blackholes generate an infinite timeline within space time without causing a second temporal axis to exist. The directional flow of time is the biggest factor and they're using the same direction in all those cases.
What do you mean? From what i know blackhole doesnt generate infinite timeline, it just slowdown time to the point it seems stop

The context here is adding the timeline to an infinitesimal part of another timeline

But hypertimeline is can be reached by overeaching/extended timeline. By doing the same logic of why time was by default is 4D because it consist 3D by it every frames or infinitesimal parts
 
What do you mean? From what i know blackhole doesnt generate infinite timeline, it just slowdown time to the point it seems stop
Oh, finally, something I can help explain.

Blackholes are theories to have time stored inside them. The time they have stored is equal to the time they have existed, and since "Hawkins radiation" is still not fully true (proven), all black holes technically have an infinite timeline inside of them.(Time is infinite in a finite space)

It should also be noted that time from the outside perspective is extended infinitely, and it looks like time is fully stopped.
 
Oh, finally, something I can help explain.

Blackholes are theories to have time stored inside them. The time they have stored is equal to the time they have existed, and since "Hawkins radiation" is still not fully true (proven), all black holes technically have an infinite timeline inside of them.(Time is infinite in a finite space)

It should also be noted that time from the outside perspective is extended infinitely, and it looks like time is fully stopped.
I dont know where you get this, can you provide your source for your claim?
Time is distorted inside blackhole but not stored, and no time doesnt extended to infinity inside black hole

Time just slowed down, it doesnt adding time
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top