• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Lightning Feats Value

Status
Not open for further replies.

Damage3245

He/Him
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
31,208
27,406
Just noticed this while refreshing myself on Lightning feats and our standards for them.

According to the Lightning Feats page, we are supposed to use 4.4×10^5 m/s, or in other words, 440,000 m/s for the average speed of lightning. In brackets after this, it says (Mach 1294).

But according to Unit Conversion websites, 440,000 m/s = Mach 1,282.798834.

So... if the m/s value on our page is right, shouldn't the bit in brackets say something like (Mach 1282.798834), not (Mach 1294) which is a higher value?

This shouldn't really affect any calcs if they're using the m/s value in the formulas, but if any calcs use the Mach 1294 value instead, then there will be a slight inaccuracy.
 
Yeah, speed of sound should be 343.2 m/s or something, so Mach 1282 should be the correct value.
 
Seeing how simple and straightforward this is, I don't think we need any big staff response to this thread, but one other staff member confirming that it is okay to update the page would be nice.

@Antvasima You okay with this?
 
This is perfectly fine and uncontroversial to apply, yes.
 
Okay. No problem. Thank you for helping out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top