• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Let's remove EE from Nanatsu no Taizai

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
65
Reaction score
10
Galand (Nanatsu no Taizai)

For example.

Currently: Soul Manipulation and Existence Erasure (Demons remove and eat souls, destroying them completely).

This is wrong. This is only soul destruction, as such, existence erasure should be removed from the profiles.
 
I agree with this. It is pretty straightforward Soul Destruction.
 
I agree with this and for my reasoning, I think I can copy paste my comment on other thread

Hmm I agree with this, Quincy too have the ability to destroy soul and prevent them to reincarnate to the other world but they only has soul destruction on their page, I think ppl just take that scans out of context, and in the scans Melascula never say she will erase ban soul too, just explaning what will happen to ban consciousness if his soul is destroyed, of course if one soul is destroyed and he can't reincarnate again then his consciousness will only end in void
 
Melascula explains what happens if your soul is erased. Nothing else.

The fact that she uses the word "void" is taken out of context and wanked to make it pass as EE.
 
how is it wanked??? Saint Seiya literally has the same sentence about Hades' sword killing Seiya
 
You mean this?

"Void Manipulation (Those cut by the Sword of Hades are annihilated completely in body and soul, being removed from the Wheel of Samsara and sent to the World of Emptiness where time does not exist, being unable to ever revive or reincarnate)"

If so, there are things you are missing. Here you are just destroying a soul. In SS, your body and soul are erased and are bfr'd to a void.
 
im fine with this being removed but not because of wank cause im pretty sure other profiles have just as vague reasons as this
 
If you think other profiles outside of this series require revising as well, could you do that on a new thread please?
 
This seems fine to me as well.
 
So far Nanatsu no Taizai has yet to introduce full fledged Existence Erasure. The wording is misleading given our battle standards and therefore needs to be removed.
 
So is somebody experienced willing to adjust the pages?
 
Shock97 said:
So Existence Erasure will be replaced with Soul Destruction?
They already have Soul manipulation.

To be honest, the current wording is fine as long as the EE is removed.

Proposal:

Soul Manipulation (Demons remove and eat souls, destroying them completely).
 
@Casban

That seems fine, but somebody still has to perform the edits.
 
Thank you. Did you go through all of the NNT demon profiles along with Mael?
 
I think it was agreed here to be existence erasure because "when a soul is eaten it's converted to magical power and it no longer exists so I think it can qualify as existence erasure."
 
No, it is just a form of soul manipulation.
 
I agree with that, and was just bringing the justification from the last thread.
 
As I said above, ban consciousness is no longer exist because his soul is destroyed and he can't reincarnate again.

They just explaining what happen to his consciousness if his soul is gone, never said demon can erase ban from existence.
 
@ByAsura

Okay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top