Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,124
I can swear Georr is actually doing this to spite me since he is a close friend
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can swear Georr is actually doing this to spite me since he is a close friend
Because its something that you can understand. Not evverything needs to be explained to the reader thats bad writingThis is not mentioned anywhere in the scans you are using.
I cannot really say anything here, you are saying they are not 5D since they have no feats or smth? When someone gets 5D with R>F they instantly get 5D AP and Abilities. Which is why Saikis hax scales to it, if you want to downgrade R>F then go right ahead to Staff Threads but right now with the R>F standart this is the correct way.Even if it is so, as I have already said, it is about their existence, not about their powers. We still don't know the capacity of their powers.
This statement does not refer to their powers. They are called readers not because they have the power to affect a significantly large 5-D plane, but because they exist in a different realm. You can't use a statement that is used for something else in order to gain other things.
Which is canon, this is the third time I told you this. 4th wall is a genuine plane of existence in the verse and used as a verse mechanic.It's not even that they see "the whole 4D realm" as fiction. It's a 4th wall breaking. Especially in that scene, "Shounen Jump" and some other stuffs are also mentioned.. It's all about them knowing something.
He isnt doing it, he is explaining how it would work in the Supreme Readers perspective. Read the text he says he is basically showing how it works for our perspectiveAlso, in this logic, you have to consider Saiki as 5-D because he's the one who holds the manga.
I am trying to make you understand how our R>f standarts work. Right now R>F gives AP and hax but no HDE since HDE is about maths and stuff, if you want you can change it yourselfStill whataboutism.
Dude, I know what a wanker you are Shion
Because its something that you can understand. Not evverything needs to be explained to the reader thats bad writing
You said above that these characters are not 5-D, they only scale to it as AP and hax. Now here you are saying that they are 5-D...I cannot really say anything here, you are saying they are not 5D since they have no feats or smth? When someone gets 5D with R>F they instantly get 5D AP and Abilities. Which is why Saikis hax scales to it, if you want to downgrade R>F then go right ahead to Staff Threads but right now with the R>F standart this is the correct way.
The fact that it is canon to break the fourth wall is irrelevant. It's still not a qualitative superiority feat.Which is canon, this is the third time I told you this. 4th wall is a genuine plane of existence in the verse and used as a verse mechanic.
Again, only your interpretation. It's not what's happening in the scan.He isnt doing it, he is explaining how it would work in the Supreme Readers perspective. Read the text he says he is basically showing how it works for our perspective
If this is your knowledge on R>F, please stop teaching people immediately.I am trying to make you understand how our R>f standarts work. Right now R>F gives AP and hax but no HDE since HDE is about maths and stuff, if you want you can change it yourself
I am talking about their AP. Not mathematical axis. It should be obvious…You said above that these characters are not 5-D, they only scale to it as AP and hax. Now here you are saying that they are 5-D...
You literally said they shouldnt gain 5D AP since they dont have HDEAnd you keep saying "R>F standards" but you are the one who doesn't know about the standards.
Look up the page for R>F. It says “reading the universe as a story, a book or such is R>f” so you are wrongLet alone the fact that this is not R>F
They dont have HDE correct, yet they have 5D AP and Abilities. Thats what R>f gives us. HDE needs mathematical axis and such which obviously dont exist in R>F.even if we assume that, you cannot take the statement out of its intended use. When a character gains HDE with a qualitative superiority, it doesn't reflect on their AP, in the same way that when a character gains AP with qualitative superiority, it doesn't reflect on their HDE. You need to make a decision rn.
They are reading the dimension. Which on its own implies R>F paired with the other scans PAIRED with the 4th wall breaking being canon here. Its very well a R>F and a AP+Hax featAnd putting your desicion aside, the statement here is that these Supreme Observers are called readers because they are watching others from a different dimension.
I am not even gonna answer this lmaoThe fact that it is canon to break the fourth wall is irrelevant. It's still not a qualitative superiority feat.
Read the damn scan. Saiki literally says “Lets assume you are reading a book”Again, only your interpretation. It's not what's happening in the scan.
Literally no one is giving them HDE. HDE needs Mathematical Axis and more, R>F gives AP and Power Level.I don't know how many times I am explaining this, but you cannot use a statement outside its meaning. If statements of qualitative superiority are used for your existence, it only gives you HDE, it doesn't affect your AP. And if it is used for your AP, it doesn't give you HDE. You cannot use the statement for everything unless the statement says so.
No? I am saying that that statement is used for the existence of those characters, not for Sight Energy itself, and therefore (because R>F alone does not give HDE) Sight Energy will not be 5-D.You literally said they shouldnt gain 5D AP since they dont have HDE
Are you really serious? Or are you doing this on purpose?Look up the page for R>F. It says “reading the universe as a story, a book or such is R>f” so you are wrong
Sight Energy COMES from them and their minds. Saiki also shows his powers work on them further proving 5D hax.No? I am saying that that statement is used for the existence of those characters, not for Sight Energy itself, and therefore (because R>F alone does not give HDE) Sight Energy will not be 5-D.
And I'm really not going to respond to the rest of the text, it's too much of a dumbass.
Yet r>f gives hax. You can try to change it in staff threads but rn it does.It doesn't change anything.
Coming from them =/= The statement for their existence includes their power.
From R>F Page: Reality-Fiction Transcendence is a state where a being is qualitatively superior to another world, as a result of seeing the world as fiction and thus being more 'real' than said world. Due to this, the character will be treated as completely superior to the cosmology it transcends, and all characters limited to it, and will thus be granted a higher tier.The fact that it is canon to break the fourth wall is irrelevant. It's still not a qualitative superiority feat.
That cannot even be called a point lmao.
To add:5-D For the Readers. Not for Saiki. His hax and maybe AP scale.
Its literally not. The other scan shows these “readers” see the world as a manga. They can hold it and see that its 2 dimensional. Also how tf is “readers” in this context not obvious? Its talking about “us” in canon.
Making readers see the whole world of Saiki as a book (or something like that, I'm bad at expressing myself).Well then, what did you think about Toritsuka’s first chapter? Was it as bad as you expected? That’s good to hear. Well, it was no laughing matter for me… There was a high chance that you would shut the book immediately after realizing that Toritsuka would be the one talking. So thank you for getting this far.
I’ve been able to hear all of our readers’ thoughts on Toritsuka’s chapter thanks to my telepathic skills, but if I had to summarize the most common opinions, it would be something like:
“Toritsuka’s chapter…? Why are they doing something so risky…?”
“Did they forget the tragedy that was Chapter 30 in the manga?! They must be out of their minds!”
“I don’t care if it’s a novelization, I don’t think there was any need to make a bet so unfavorable!”
I’ve been hearing voices following that same train of thought for a while, but don’t worry, I completely agree.
If the purpose of this R>F statement is only for your existence and not for the transcendence of your power, it does not give you a higher tier. It is only the Supreme Observers existen themselves (their existence) that are superior to the 4D plane with R>F here... Not their powersFrom R>F Page: Reality-Fiction Transcendence is a state where a being is qualitatively superior to another world, as a result of seeing the world as fiction and thus being more 'real' than said world. Due to this, the character will be treated as completely superior to the cosmology it transcends, and all characters limited to it, and will thus be granted a higher tier.
Damn. Why are you so cringe all of a sudden?OMFG this kid is fr serious
Being infinitely superior and seeing it as a simply manga a fictional story should be enough for qs and r>f. Which gives higher tier and haxIf the purpose of this R>F statement is only for your existence and not for the transcendence of your power, it does not give you a higher tier.
Never stated, just your interperation.Being infinitely superior
Nothing like that happened. These things you said were only shown as breaking the fourth wall. Not as R>Fseeing it as a simply manga a fictional story
It might have been, if such things had statedWhich gives higher tier and hax
Never stated, just your interperation.
“For example, if a character were to view an entire space-time continuum as fiction, they would be superior to such an extent that finite, or even basic infinite, differences in power cannot overcome their superiority. Thus, they would be treated as more than infinitely greater, such as in this case Low 1-C. The gap between the higher world and the lower world would be strictly one of quality, not quantity.”
Literally on the R>F page again.
Its a canon 4th wall as shown in the novel so your point doesnt work lmaoNothing like that happened. These things you said were only shown as breaking the fourth wall. Not as R>F
They agreed before my arguments. I would like them to read the theead again to vote again.Okay, let's stop now because this is going around in circles. Both sides have responded, for now there are 2 staff who have agreed with the OP. We need more staff
Already in the OP there are the same arguments that Low 1-C accepted... But ok.They agreed before my arguments. I would like them to read the theead again to vote again.
I dont understand. The scans I posted and Edutyn quoted are not there…Already in the OP there are the same arguments that Low 1-C accepted... But ok.
I meant in more detail. Like, what is the step for step rundown of what happens?Alternate Evil Saiki vs Our Saili
It proved the LN is canon in the sense that it is canonically a book in the verse. It is not canon in the sense that what is written in the novel actually happens. In fact, the manga showing it as a book pretty clearly proves that what happens in the book does not happen within Saiki's own reality. It's just a fictional work in his.Thats 4th wall breaking done by Saiki but it proved Novel is canon. Unless you want to argue he is 5 dimensional because he sees it as fiction lol.
In real life physics gravity might be an 11 dimensional force. Doesn't make that Tier 1 either. I also see no evidence of it being 5D to begin with. It only says from a different dimension, which is not a statement of higher dimensionality. Likewise, the R>F stuff is, as it stands, too vague. I don't know if context of the novel adds anything to it. That's why I asked for a run down.How is having 5D energy not Low 1-C?
It only implies that the LN is canon, as a book in the verse. I.e. nothing that happens in the novel would be relevant, as it didn't ever happen.This implies the ln is canon though, as saiki doesnt even remember this information himself. Also, the ln appearing as a work of fiction doesnt really debunk anything, Saiki does a LOT of 4th wall breaking for its gags
I will answer after I come home. Though you are taking his fourth wall breaking too literally. For example by your logic would this be High 1-B lolI meant in more detail. Like, what is the step for step rundown of what happens?
It proved the LN is canon in the sense that it is canonically a book in the verse. It is not canon in the sense that what is written in the novel actually happens. In fact, the manga showing it as a book pretty clearly proves that what happens in the book does not happen within Saiki's own reality. It's just a fictional work in his.
As per reality equalization standards seeing something as fictional from the regular universe is not Tier 1. Saiki is 3D. It's the LN he views as fiction that would be Tier 11, for being fictional relative to what in Saiki's verse is the real world.
In real life physics gravity might be an 11 dimensional force. Doesn't make that Tier 1 either. I also see no evidence of it being 5D to begin with. It only says from a different dimension, which is not a statement of higher dimensionality. Likewise, the R>F stuff is, as it stands, too vague. I don't know if context of the novel adds anything to it. That's why I asked for a run down.
It only implies that the LN is canon, as a book in the verse. I.e. nothing that happens in the novel would be relevant, as it didn't ever happen.
It would have the same relationship to Saiki's verse as Chuck Norris jokes have to real life Chuck Norris. It features characters from that verse and might involve details about the character, but it's just fictional.
I really doubt they would make a 4th wall break that shows something existing as a book in the verse if the events of that book actually happened. That aside, there is no other evidence that it is canon as far as I know, so if this is just a 4th wall break, then you wouldn't even have evidence that it is canon as a fictional work within the verse.
So does Tier 1 revisions on small verses need 3? or more approvals?If either @Lonkitt (though they are currently busy with irl stuff, so I wouldn't wait for them) or @Maverick_Zero_X show support to OP, I would consider it completely accepted.
For the record, I am currently leaning to agreeing too, but am neutral overall.
5 at the minimumSo does Tier 1 revisions on small verses need 3? or more approvals?
Then the Low 1-C should be removed regardless, no?5 at the minimum
I am being fair and giving time for the og staff that evaluated the upgrade to come and read this one and give their thoughts. DDM has given theirs, Lonkitt unfortunately will be busy for a bit, so that leaves Mav.Then the Low 1-C should be removed regardless, no?
I will make a new CRT for it regardless after I research this more. So I am fine with the removal and aplogise since I thought 3 was enoughif another staff agreed and you want this accepted regardless, fair enough with me.
3 is good for non controversial and up to tier 2 stuff.I will make a new CRT for it regardless after I research this more. So I am fine with the removal and aplogise since I thought 3 was enough
I already reached out to him.You should call @edutyn for that since he knows more about that.
I really doubt they would make a 4th wall break that shows something existing as a book in the verse if the events of that book actually happened. That aside, there is no other evidence that it is canon as far as I know, so if this is just a 4th wall break, then you wouldn't even have evidence that it is canon as a fictional work within the verse.
Touché, but given how things are referred to as happening in the book as well instead of in reality, there is quite a difference still.
I can give you the link if you want, I am reading it rnAnyway, I guess I will go and read the novels for now so that I can debate this better.