• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Kong(Legendary) Vs Cloverfield Monster

Kong should take this through superior combat and agility feats, plus better showings of intelligence and using his surroundings to his advantage than the Cloverfield Monster demonstrated.
 
oh my god someone actully commented on a thread of mine ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
 
Going with Kong, superior combat experience and it has far more feats. I am sure the Cloverfield Monster won't be able to fight back properly because it never fought another monster, but its durability is superior so it's going to take a while before it dies
 
They're both infants aren't they? I'd like to see them fight as adults, also isn't clover way bigger?
 
Koalteufel said:
They're both infants aren't they? I'd like to see them fight as adults, also isn't clover way bigger?
Well We don't know their full sizes but Kong at adult is usally estimated to be 300 ft while Adult Clover is estimated to be 500 ft So Adult Clover would step on or swat Adult Kong like a fly
 
Wasn't King Kong hurt by depth charges?

It just seems like Clover is more tanky.

However, King Kong is smarter and more skilled in combat, so he could win.
 
While i can see Clover being more tanky than Ramarak, i am pretty sure Kong can still outsmart him, he is way more skilled and experienced


And IIRC, Clover is just a "baby"
 
I first wanted to say Kong wins this, but Clover (350 food, 5,806.04 metric tons) is far bigger than Kong (ca. 100 food). Kong may have the advantage of intelligence and fighting experience, but that does nothing when he faces a far bigger and stronger opponent.

A slightly more intelligent chicken, still loses in a fight with an emu ;D
 
QuagsireTheLegend said:
I don`t know, that comparison is kind of off when you take in consideration it is a baby Emu
Still works in terms of size. Furthermore: Clover was already fully grown, just mentally an infant.
 
Yeah, and that infant mind is going to be a huge edge for Kong, specially in new york where he has so many things he can use as weapons, Clover might be bigger, but he is far less agile than Kong.


I still give it to Kong because of him being far more experienced and agile
 
Kong is more agile and smarter.

Also Kong's Attack potency is Large Building to City Block level while Clover is only Large Building level.

Vote for Kong.
 
Kong for reason above, can't wait till his stat change after he fight godzilla in next movie.
 
Just asking, but if Kong is 8-C to 8-B by sheer size and Grover is proven to be twice the size, shouldnt Grover be the same Tier ?
 
Meosos said:
Or Kong should be downgraded to 8-C
Should probably get downgraded to just High 8-C, and remove the 8-B tier. He simply isn't big enough to sustain that, as Clover is bigger than Kong, while he only has the High 8-C tier.
 
Back
Top