- 12,297
- 5,562
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
do you agree with Low 1-C?Dude, what the...
Both writers and fiction see, but it is said that they are the 10th dimension, but there is nothing about the 10th dimension being spatial and the are infinite universes... It's the first time I've seen something so complicated.
I think whoever designed it pushed all the buttons.
With the new system, qualitative superiority isn’t going to be used for below 1-A.do you agree with Low 1-C?
coz they see the infinite universes as fiction
I guess yeah. It could even be 11-D, but I think it would not be right to say anything clear about it because we don't know the nature of 10-D.do you agree with Low 1-C?
coz they see the infinite universes as fiction
I guess he means Quantitative superiority. Because R>F can also give you this according to the context of the verseWith the new system, qualitative superiority isn’t going to be used for below 1-A.
But not with the tier system. It will just be fancy tier 2, if actual spatial dimensions are not involved.I guess he means Quantitative superiority. Because R>F can also give you this according to the context of the verse
It says "infinite universes" there, which indicates that there are at least 4-D/ Low 2-C structures, and with R>F you would get 5-D (because R>F in the verse seems to give only a dimensional superiority rather than a qualitative superiority)But not with the tier system. It will just be fancy tier 2, if actual spatial dimensions are not involved.
it's not qualified anyway since a fiction raising on its own to writer's reality is a disqualifying factorsWith the new system, qualitative superiority isn’t going to be used for below 1-A.
More information will need to be provided. The difference has to be explicitly shown to be quantitative as in an extra spatial direction, an uncountably infinite universes, or a major size difference between layers.It says "infinite universes" there, which indicates that there are at least 4-D/ Low 2-C structures, and with R>F you would get 5-D (because R>F in the verse seems to give only a dimensional superiority rather than a qualitative superiority)