Guacamolefletcher
Username Only- 2,232
- 2,470
Why exactly is the multiverse feat treated as 11d in context, if he was integrating with the multiverse by fusing with the different versions of himself in context?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a Gurren Lagann scaler, I don't have any issues with it, really.As much as I like Gurren Lagann, the verse's "scaling" is too well. . . complicated
Perhaps, it's just me reallyI'm a Gurren Lagann scaler, I don't have any issues with it, really.
What is this based on? Also, I think a much more consistent interpretation is the universes themselves are 11-dimensional, rather than there being 10 and 11 dimensional universes. I think those might be mistranslated.mention Anti-Spiral is native to a dimension that transcends even those infinite number of 10-D to 11-D universes which an argument could be made for 1-B. I'm unsure of it myself, but I have heard some possibilities for exactly that.
Please do so, because I'm confused as to why he would exactly have fused with the multiverse as the structure, opposed to the different versions of himself.We did have quite a bit of threads discussing this, but I do not remember full details. I also do not have much time, but I could simply just link some previous threads when I do some digging.
Why are they 10 to 11d? Is there any scan specified for that?universes themselves are 11-dimensional, rather than there being 10 and 11 dimensional universes.
There are 5 pieces of evidence pointing to this, you can read the Gurren Lagann cosmology blog.Why are they 10 to 11d? Is there any scan specified for that?
Yes I just saw the blog, it's fine.There are 5 pieces of evidence pointing to this, you can read the Gurren Lagann cosmology blog.
Can you elaborate which multiversal feat? There were several of them.Why exactly is the multiverse feat treated as 11d in context, if he was integrating with the multiverse by fusing with the different versions of himself in context?