• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Godzilla upgrade/fix

Messages
20,397
Reaction score
16,217

The full calculation is accepted, that includes the high-end. This means anyone who scales above base Garoga Nuke should scale to 6.26 foe, but for some reason they scale from the low-end on the profiles.
There's no reason for that and I read like a dozen CRTs in the history of both Godzilla and GN profiles and none had a statement that only the low-end should be used.

Basically, big G should be rescaled or rather fixed.
 
The scaling chains in the verse page will also be adjusted.
 
Is there any reason to though? What makes the High-End more valid than the Low-End if both are accepted?
 
Is there any reason to though? What makes the High-End more valid than the Low-End if both are accepted?
What doesn't? If both are accepted then that means both approaches are valid in the eyes of a staff members. When a calc member think that one end is more realistic than the other they always say that it is better to use the more realistic end. If they don't it means any end can be used however you like it.
 
If you want more reason I'd argue that the high end goes more in depth into the calculations and thus is likely to be more accurate as it carefully deduces the statistics.
 
Ok, I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just trying to understand which one is more realistic/reasonable as you said. If the High-End Calc goes into more depth, I can see that as a valid reason to use it.
 
Back
Top