Gerard Minor revision

[Adam1396]

In this thread gerard's cross inside his head has been accepted as weakness.

Bleach: The Miracle minor stuff

1. Gerard should have a more elaborated explaination for the weakness of his mid godly regen as it's confirmed by Kubo that destroying his cross would result his death https://www.fanverse.org/threads/klub-outside-kubo-answers-translations.1239498/ Q475: Gerard's Schrift, "M - The Miracle"...

vsbattles.com

Now some core things has been ignored while adding the weakness.
1. Interpretation of kubo's answer.
2. Ignoring feats.

Kubo's answer about zaraki being incapable of detroy it can imply,
1. It was just a fun comment to make a mokery of zaraki, who has been potrayed as the symbol of strength within the verse. Showing it's indestructive nature.
2. How it can not be destroyed by conventional means just like hogyoku, which can not be destroyed despite erasure.

Best way to fix this is to look into Gerard's feat.

1. Cross's indestructive nature: It outright ignored zaraki's bankai.
Though I find it hard to argue whether that zaraki was significantly stronger considering he one shotted gerard. (If other members has convincing argument, it can be added as well)

Main point is :

2. Cross should have mid godly regeneration for similar reason as gerard. Rather it has shown technically better regeneration.

Bleach: Mid Godly Justifications

vsbattles.fandom.com

It's similar case as aizen and hogyoku.

Proposal:
Weakness - gerard's regeneration can be negated by destroying his cross. Though his cross posses similar level of regeneration as himself.
(Optional) It has also shown indestructive nature as well.

 

[MrTayman616]

1. Cross's indestructive nature: It outright ignored zaraki's bankai.
Though I find it hard to argue whether that zaraki was significantly stronger considering he one shotted gerard. (If other members has convincing argument, it can be added as well)

That doesn't make it indestructible. It would mean it's above Kenpachi's AP.

2. Cross should have mid godly regeneration for similar reason as gerard. Rather it has shown technically better regeneration.

Bleach: Mid Godly Justifications

vsbattles.fandom.com

Cross having mid godly regen doesn't make sense in my opinion. "Can you kill Gerard: No, he can regenerate mid godly. But he can be killed if the cross is destroyed. Can you destroy the cross : no it can regenerate better than Gerard."

Though if feats and statements shows it, can't say anything.

@Sigurd_Snake_in_The_Eye @ShiftCtrlAltDeleteTabFn @ReaperAndBlues @Arc7Kuroi @Johner2133451 You guys input would be greatly appreciated.

You can't tag people iirc. Only staff members can tag as far as i know.

 

[Adam1396]

That doesn't make it indestructible. It would mean it's above Kenpachi's AP.

Cross having mid godly regen doesn't make sense in my opinion. "Can you kill Gerard: No, he can regenerate mid godly. But he can be killed if the cross is destroyed. Can you destroy the cross : no it can regenerate better than Gerard."

Though if feats and statements shows it, can't say anything.

You can't tag people iirc. Only staff members can tag as far as i know.

It just explains the context for the word "destruction". Since we have another similar case, it makes things easier.
We can't deny feats or make a comolete contradictory claim based on a q&a. What we can do is provide more aligned context.

What I kniw we can't tag stuffs. But we can tag members.

 

[Johner2133451]

@Sigurd_Snake_in_The_Eye @ShiftCtrlAltDeleteTabFn @ReaperAndBlues @Arc7Kuroi @Johner2133451 You guys input would be greatly appreciated.

Uh only staffs can tag members