• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Forgive me Howard, for I have sinned

You called?

Anyway, it goes like this:

Kharn: My amulet negates anything you can do that's unfair.

Lavos: Good thing I can negate immunities, even if they come from items.

The question is, will that work. Regardless, Kharn can't put down Lavos, so at best it's inconclusive.
 
Actually, Kharn can negate anything he wants, he just does it to what he considers unfair, he could negate mid godly regen, but he wouldn't.

Also can you elaborate on negate immunities?
 
Actually, even without hax, Lavos should still win though things like Rain of Destruction, Grandstone, and Starburst, as they're normal attacks, and again, Kharn can't put him down. It's only a matter of time.

Edit: Ninja'd
 
@Gar. Lavos has an attack that removes immunities, even if they come from items. , rendering the party susceptible to his other attacks.
 
Lavos can't negate the collar tho, because somewhere, in the depths of the warp, there's an hyperdimensional God sitting on a throne, loking at powers and saying:

Khorne: "Yeah, this looks unfair. Null." *points finger* "Yeah, this doesn't look nice, either. I ain't having that." *Nulls* "What BS power is that? Not today." *Nulls.*

Not voting, just saying that the collar does work.
 
The real cal howard said:
Actually, even without hax, Lavos should still win though things like Rain of Destruction, Grandstone, and Starburst, as they're normal attacks, and again, Kharn can't put him down. It's only a matter of time.
I'm aware, but I'm still going with my answer ^here.
 
snip
@Ever It's immunity, but he can cancel them. It's not like he throws an attack that damages people through their immunities - one of his techniques cancels them out (like power nullification, only against immunities/resistances), THEN he unleashes an attack and it works.

Nonetheless, like I already said, that won't fly here what with Khorne saying lolnope anyways so it's a non factor in this match.
 
Nitpick: Kharn doesn't have an item that grants him Khorne's protection. He has a Blessing that comes straight from Khorne, himself.

Other champions of Khorne may have a Collar of Khorne to grant them such abilities but Kharn is unique. He's the best mortal servant of Khorne and the Blood God grants him personal attention and favor.
 
Depends. Would Khorne nullify Lavos' resurrection or summoning himself and stuff? If so, Kharn can win. Otherwise Inconclusive because Khorne will nullify 95% of what Lavos has anyways and if Kharn dies he probably gets resurrected too, so no one is going anywhere.
 
Thing is, here's a big question.

If Kharn killed someone over and over and said person kept redirecting but still couldn't kill Kharn once, would Khorn just say f it and nullify it just so Kharn can actually kill?
 
/\ That's precisely what's preventing me from voting atm.

If the answer is yes, then I vote Kharn.

If no, Inconclusive.
 
Actually, Lavos can kill Kharn without the use of hax. And it has never been stated that Khorne negates things that don't cause harm to Kharn.
 
Destruction rains from the heavens >> Would probably be nulled. Grand Stone >> I guess this could work. Starburst >> Legit don't remember how it looks like.

As for the other things, I dunno. That's why I'm asking the people who are more knowledgeable of Kharn and 40k in general before making any assumptions or votes.
 
The real cal howard said:
Actually, Lavos can kill Kharn without the use of hax. And it has never been stated that Khorne negates things that don't cause harm to Kharn.
Khorne negated someone's inherent psychic awareness so that they weren't even aware of Kharn until they could hear his footsteps.
 
Also going to point out that Kharn is more than 2,600 times stronger than Lavos. He's not an idiot, and is used to fighting daemons who distort the laws of reality to alter fate and causality. He's going to hack through Lavos core eventually, and when he does it's game over.
 
Then Kharn takes it handily because Lavos isn't getting anything against his anti-hax.

Yet another haxxed one falls to the forces of the Blood God.

But Khorne will be like: That's a new kind of skull (Would you call it a skull?). Pretty exotic, will be awesome decoration.
 
Well, yeah. His offensive hax gets nulled, Kharn is superior physically and considering what Azathoth just explained, pretty sure Lavos will stay dead if he dies here since Khorne's blessing works even against stuff that's not necessarily offensive.
 
Said quote, because I like providing proof:

"Wiping the sickly ichor from the blade of his weapon, Kersai became aware of the presence of another on the steel walkway. Disturbingly, the psyker's warp gifts had not alerted him, the sound of footsteps being the first indicator of somebody approaching."
 
Back
Top