• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

First Calc - A bit lost. Any pointers?

Messages
617
Reaction score
161
Hello everybody, I’m attempting to calculate something for the first time and I’m a bit lost - pointers would be appreciated. I’m not exactly as mathematically inclined as some of you probably are lol.

Trying to calculate this:


Values being used:

High striker example shown here: https://grokipedia.com/page/High_striker
  • bell height: 11 feet (3.3528 m)
  • puck mass: 0.4 kg
  • efficiency: 25% (the amount of energy transferred from the strike into the puck)
What I’ve tried so far:
  • Measuring the total time using the frame rate, etc., and calculating it that way (I’m specifically doing it this way because the cut at the beginning makes it hard to measure the speed of the first rise, so I’m using the total time). This outputs about the 70–80 J range, which seems low. Is this simply the lack of mechanical resistance? Perhaps cartoon inconsistences? I’m not sure. Counting every easily viewable rise outputs similar.

  • A fractional-loss-based model which outputs about 266 J based on the fact that the sixth rise of the puck is 4/6ths of the way to the bell — but this model is highly assumptive (consistent energy depletion which is not necessarily true, etc).
I would really appreciate somewhere to start with this so I have a direction.
 
Back
Top