• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Doubts about Level 1-A

934
578
  1. Can characters ascend between Low 1-C and Low 1-A through Qualitative Superiority that does not meet the requirements for 1-A?
  2. Can you provide examples of Qualitative Superiority that meet the requirements to be 1-A in the wiki?
 
  1. Can characters ascend between Low 1-C and Low 1-A through Qualitative Superiority that does not meet the requirements for 1-A?
No, Qualitative Superiority is necessairly 1-A

  1. Can you provide examples of Qualitative Superiority that meet the requirements to be 1-A in the wiki?
Every Qualitative Superiority is 1-A any type of "transcendence" below 1-A is decided by quantitative superiority
 
No, Qualitative Superiority is necessairly 1-A


Every Qualitative Superiority is 1-A any type of "transcendence" below 1-A is decided by quantitative superiority
So is 5d not considered QS to the universe anymore?

I don't really get the whole

R^3 and R^4 have the same cardnality

But at the same time the site uses dimensional tiering and asserts a 4d spacial universe has uncountably infinite universes worth of matter/spacetime

So is the gap between aleph0 and aleph1 not considered Qualitative?
 
So is 5d not considered QS to the universe anymore?

I don't really get the whole

R^3 and R^4 have the same cardnality

But at the same time the site uses dimensional tiering and asserts a 4d spacial universe has uncountably infinite universes worth of matter/spacetime

So is the gap between aleph0 and aleph1 not considered Qualitative?
Everything that can be measured by math is under Quantitative superiority

Qualitative Superiority is about transcendence in a more philosophical approach of perfection and the complete superiority over anything below it
 
So is the gap between aleph0 and aleph1 not considered Qualitative?

Not anymore.

Q: What is "qualitative superiority"?​

A: To put it simply: It is superiority over lesser things that involves no element of quantity, or amount, in any manner whatsoever. It, instead, hinges entirely on the nature of the character's existence and ontology. In general, all characters with such superiority over lesser things are 1-A.

An spatial place that holds the cardinality of aleph 0 and another that holds the cardinality of aleph 1 have a fundamental difference but not a qualitative one, since both exist within the same "fictional setting/layer". Since the smaller one, Aleph 0 in this case, can reach the other through a concatenation of pieces of the same fictional setting/layer.

On the other hand, it doesn't matter the concatenation or accumulation of pieces of a fictional place, they could never reach a "real" place, since there is a qualitative difference between them

You can also understand "fictional" as non-outer and real as "outer". It's just an example
 
Not anymore.


An spatial place that holds the cardinality of aleph 0 and another that holds the cardinality of aleph 1 have a fundamental difference but not a qualitative one, since both exist within the same "fictional setting/layer". Since the smaller one, Aleph 0 in this case, can reach the other through a concatenation of pieces of the same fictional setting/layer.

On the other hand, it doesn't matter the concatenation or accumulation of pieces of a fictional place, they could never reach a "real" place, since there is a qualitative difference between them

You can also understand "fictional" as non-outer and real as "outer". It's just an example
Everything that can be measured by math is under Quantitative superiority

Qualitative Superiority is about transcendence in a more philosophical approach of perfection and the complete superiority over anything below it
Ok that makes sense

So uncountably infinite gaps are just treated as below r>f as a whole and the standards for QS went up?
 
Everything that is related to math is below 1-A and consequently below Qualitative Superiority
Low 1-A is still math based right? Basically the pinnacle of math, the largest possible set of universes or whatever

Not that it matters the label so much, it's just where you draw the line, what matters is R>F > any amount of dimensions or number of anything uncountable of alephinfinity

Thanks
 
Low 1-A is still math based right? Basically the pinnacle of math, the largest possible set of universes or whatever

Not that it matters the label so much, it's just where you draw the line, what matters is R>F > any amount of dimensions or number of anything uncountable of alephinfinity

Thanks
Pretty much

Once again Philosophy >>> Math
 
Pretty much

Once again Philosophy >>> Math
I kinda hate Outer scaling, I kinda hate dimensional scaling too, but at least the base concept there is quantifiable, 4d = uncountable 3d, and so on to infinite dimensions, uncountably infinite dimensions, and all possible permutations of the universe/multiverse/omniverse

But once you get to 1-A it's like "oh well he trancends space and time, which means..."

And like, every verse treats them different, heck they treat dimensions sooo different too, but once you get into unquantifiable philosophy and logic my brian breaks even more
 
Every Qualitative Superiority is 1-A any type of "transcendence" below 1-A is decided by quantitative superiority

Well, can you give me examples of qualitative superiority within the base level 1-A wiki?I just want to better understand what it classifies, with practical examples.
 
Well, can you give me examples of qualitative superiority within the base level 1-A wiki?I just want to better understand what it classifies, with practical examples.
Here are some examples:

You can find some Verses that had their 1-A ratings approved under the new system in the below post:
 
Here are some examples:

You can find some Verses that had their 1-A ratings approved under the new system in the below post:

Thank you.
 
Back
Top