• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Do these attacks qualify as realistic light?


This is not a full list of qualities that can qualify/disqualify a feat as a true laser/light beam, but they are what is taken as basic by this wiki.

In all cases, when light beam feats pop-up, they must be discussed with the staff before implementation.”

Btw, if you read the top part more closely, it does have this mention too.
Then it should be in mind so we can fully understand it.
 
Explosions can be used as supplementary evidence to disregard something as a laser, but it can't be the sole piece of evidence as the disqualifier.

It's what the minor sentence note is about regarding not listing everything that does and doesn't qualify as a laser.
So do the attacks qualify as realistic light or not?
 
I mean, that's more for the supporters to weigh in on. Just that the current evidence is mostly that its based on sunlight, while its on screen depictions show that it doesn't behave like light all that much.
 
Back
Top