• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Can Antimatter feats be calculated?

Well, the chemical energy can be calculated, but the volume, mass, or density is hard to swallow. And if something is described as "An Antimatter bomb" we avoid assumptions that the whole thing is made of anti-matter.
 
Question is vague, but usually yes. E=mc^2, use the mass of the antimatter plus the matter it destroys as m, and the speed of light as c. This will give you energy in joules.
 
Though even so, as I mentioned above, the density of Antimatter isn't always something that can be properly calculated. Though if there's confirmed mass; then yeah it's that formula above. And when something is referred to as "Anti-Matter Weapon" it's not always assumed the entire mass of it or its projectiles are 100% antimatter.
 
Though even so, as I mentioned above, the density of Antimatter isn't always something that can be properly calculated. Though if there's confirmed mass; then yeah it's that formula above. And when something is referred to as "Anti-Matter Weapon" it's not always assumed the entire mass of it or its projectiles are 100% antimatter.
If it's not stated, you can usually rely on the destruction it causes, or worst-case-scenario, assume it's similar to an equivilant real bomb, and use the density of that bomb's volatile material for reference.
 
I agree on just using destruction values if there's no proof on amount of Anti-Matter
 
Back
Top