Calculation: Steel Vaporization Values

[ByArrow]

I calculated the vaporization value for steel.

Steel Vaporization Values

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[AppleMaker]

Dang, 1 cm and it's already 4 times above baseline wall level

 

[Dalesean027]

@Antvasima @DontTalkDT @Flashlight237 @KLOL506 @Agnaa @Dark-Carioca @DMUA
This should be enough for right now I think

 

[Flashlight237]

I just chimed in.

 

[ByArrow]

After Flashlight's comment, I added stainless steel to the blog too.

 

[ByArrow]

Bump

 

[Vzearr]

Bump

You can only bump after 24 hours has gone by.

 

[ByArrow]

You can only bump after 24 hours has gone by.

I'm sure I can bump after 12 hours has gone by.

 

[Vzearr]

I'm sure I can bump after 12 hours has gone by.

Hm, I believe it's 24, but I'll re-check.

 

[Dalesean027]

The calc seems reasonable enough

 

[KLOL506]

Anyone find it odd how both atomization and vaporization values of steel are so similar? Iron too.

 

[Dalesean027]

Anyone find it odd how both atomization and vaporization values of steel are so similar? Iron too.

It is pretty wild that they are practically the same within a small margin of error

 

[ByArrow]

Anyone find it odd how both atomization and vaporization values of steel are so similar? Iron too.

What do you think about the calculation? Is it work?

Also, how many CGMs need to accept this for it to be accepted and added? We currently have two acceptances.

 

[KLOL506]

I haven't touched chemistry in ages.

Ye olde DontTalkDT and Executor shall help you out.

 

[Dalesean027]

@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0

 

[Executor_N0]

Anyone find it odd how both atomization and vaporization values of steel are so similar? Iron too.

I did a quick look, and it seems that it's because the enthalpies of atomization and sublimation are essentially the same for metals. The explanation seems to be

The average bond enthalpy of atomisation of an elemental solid is the same as the enthalpy of sublimation of any elemental solid that evaporates to form a monatomic gas.

If I understood correctly, the vaporization of metal with the breaking of the metallic lattice results in a metal vapor that is monoatomic in nature.
So, yeah, depending on the material, it should either be the same (Only variation depending on the source or method) or very close to it.

 

[ByArrow]

I did a quick look, and it seems that it's because the enthalpies of atomization and sublimation are essentially the same for metals. The explanation seems to be

If I understood correctly, the vaporization of metal with the breaking of the metallic lattice results in a metal vapor that is monoatomic in nature.
So, yeah, depending on the material, it should either be the same (Only variation depending on the source or method) or very close to it.

Thanks for the information. So what do you think about the calculation?

 

[KLOL506]

I did a quick look, and it seems that it's because the enthalpies of atomization and sublimation are essentially the same for metals. The explanation seems to be

If I understood correctly, the vaporization of metal with the breaking of the metallic lattice results in a metal vapor that is monoatomic in nature.
So, yeah, depending on the material, it should either be the same (Only variation depending on the source or method) or very close to it.

LOL. LMFAO even.

 

[Executor_N0]

Thanks for the information. So what do you think about the calculation?

I think it's fine

 

[ByArrow]

I think it's fine

With that, we have three acceptances.

Is this now can usable and be added to the calculation page? Or are more acceptances needed?

 

[ByArrow]

Bump

 

[ByArrow]

With that, we have three acceptances.

Is this now can usable and be added to the calculation page? Or are more acceptances needed?

Bump

 

[Dalesean027]

I feel like we need maybe one green name but I'm not sure, you at least have 4 cgm approvals tho which SHOULD be enough but just being safe

 

[Arceus0x]

Bump

 

[Antvasima]

@Antvasima @DontTalkDT @Flashlight237 @KLOL506 @Agnaa @Dark-Carioca @DMUA
This should be enough for right now I think

This seems fine to add, yes.

 

[KLOL506]

bump

 

[ByArrow]

Bump

Is this can be added now? Or do we need one more CGM vote? If it's the latter, could someone please ping the other CGMs?

 

[Dalesean027]

Erm @Antvasima is this enough to be applied

 

[Antvasima]

I think so, yes.

 

[ByArrow]

Can someone add this to the Calculations page?

Calculations

In order to determine a character's Destructive Capacity, we must first look through the character's feats and determine how much energy was exerted to perform such a feat. Sometimes, the destructive capacity of the feat can be determined easily without the need for a calculation, but most of...

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Dalesean027]

Can someone add this to the Calculations page?

Calculations

In order to determine a character's Destructive Capacity, we must first look through the character's feats and determine how much energy was exerted to perform such a feat. Sometimes, the destructive capacity of the feat can be determined easily without the need for a calculation, but most of...

vsbattles.fandom.com

Oh request the page to be opened

 

[Antvasima]

@Dereck03 @TWILIGHT-OP @Random-Helper323

Are any of you willing and able to properly handle this please?

 

[Random-Helper323]

@Dereck03 @TWILIGHT-OP @Random-Helper323

Are any of you willing and able to properly handle this please?

Do I open the page or just add it myself?

 

[Random-Helper323]

I just made the changes to the page.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you very much for helping out.

Should we close this thread then?

 

[ByArrow]

Thank you very much for helping out.

Should we close this thread then?

Yes

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so. Thank you to everybody who helped out here.