• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Alexia Midgar's profile rework

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
7,053
Reaction score
1,947
Very simple and straight forward CRT

A reworked Alexia Midgar's profile with the help of @Zefra3011;


Things to note;

She is wall level due to her durability feat, and the reason she scales to wall level on AP as well is because people comparable to her can harm her and vice versa

Also, don't mind the sandbox name, i ain't creating a new one
 
Last edited:
By the way, Cid would also scale to wall level as he is alot stronger than Alexia btw
 
I would like IA getting full explanation like current profile rather than listing a one line feat. Also copying sword play is more like technique mimicry not literal power mimicry also she was able to copy some what Shadow fighting style so list that also.

I think she should scale to this feat for speed with magic
Other than I agree with everything. Btw shouldn't she gets two keys like in current profile??
 
I would like IA getting full explanation like current profile rather than listing a one line feat.
Most of IA feats doesn't scale to her according to a friend of mine
Also copying sword play is more like technique mimicry not literal power mimicry also she was able to copy some what Shadow fighting style so list that also.
No difference, it's the same thing but different description
I think she should scale to this feat for speed with magic
Other than I agree with everything. Btw shouldn't she gets two keys like in current profile??
Akane scales to shadow garden level as she tied with the most recent joiner

Alexia isn't shadow garden member level
 
I have applied the changes you asked with the exception of the Alexia scaling to Nishino (more or less)
 
Most of IA feats doesn't scale to her according to a friend of mine
It's not about scaling to her it's about explanation where we explain training in the verse can give instinctive action. Just a additional information. So that people wouldn't misunderstand two lines of rating in the profile.
Akane scales to shadow garden level as she tied with the most recent joiner

Alexia isn't shadow garden member level
Akane forgot her fully released form whatever it's called scales to Shadow garden. The feat Linked is base Akane doing that not the fully unleased Akane who was comparable to weakest member of the shadow garden
 
Last edited:
I was blackmailed to comment here
Akane forgot her fully released from Whatever it's called scales to Shadow garden. The feat Linked is base Akane doing that not the fully unleaded Akane who was comparable to weakest member of the shadow garden
You are right, but at the same time we have no reason to believe Akane and Alexia are comparable, at least not that I'm aware. Also, I want to add that Cid was using a stated Mach 1 speed to speedblitz knights, and Alexia isn't faster than them, nor should we assume that Calc to be a baseline for any magic user.
Other than I agree with everything. Btw shouldn't she gets two keys like in current profile??
I'm the one who said to use a single key; the reason is that a second one is extremely redundant. Firstly, Alexia trains daily, so a "Post-training" key makes little sense. Secondly, the second key, as it is currently, is just "stronger than before" with the speed being faster than 10 yo Cid without a justification (which is also wrong imo). The point is, there is no real distinction to warrant a second key; she just gets better at skills.
 
I was blackmailed to comment here

You are right, but at the same time we have no reason to believe Akane and Alexia are comparable, at least not that I'm aware. Also, I want to add that Cid was using a stated Mach 1 speed to speedblitz knights, and Alexia isn't faster than them, nor should we assume that Calc to be a baseline for any magic user.
Didn't Alexia was fast enough to keep up with Rose who could cook members of the Cult who should be equal to if not Stronger than those knights? Shouldn't that means the knights are just weaker than Alexia rather than she is being slower than them?.
I'm the one who said to use a single key; the reason is that a second one is extremely redundant. Firstly, Alexia trains daily, so a "Post-training" key makes little sense. Secondly, the second key, as it is currently, is just "stronger than before" with the speed being faster than 10 yo Cid without a justification (which is also wrong imo). The point is, there is no real distinction to warrant a second key; she just gets better at skills.
Well we do list the keys even if it's only sts but it's alright if we don't need that here.
 
Didn't Alexia was fast enough to keep up with Rose who could cook members of the Cult who should be equal to if not Stronger than those knights? Shouldn't that means the knights are just weaker than Alexia rather than she is being slower than them?.
That's fair. Rose could blitz some Cult members, and Alexia's speed was stated to be comparable to Rose's.

Though I don't think we have a clear line of scaling to say that Rose (before training in the SG) or Alexia are comparable to Akane. But I'll look into this again to make sure.
 
This is appealing to reality. Unless they show it in the fictional setting, we don't assume authors account for the physiological implications of what they write. Disagree.
Going by current standards, Ig theres nothing wrong with this, so I have no reason to disagree but at the same time it reads more like she replicated it because of constant exposure to it over and over again, which again is fine by our standards, but strikes me more as an intelligence feat personally. May make a thread on that some other time, but just felt the need to mention that, but its still fine.

Rest aslo looks okay, high quality page all things considered, good job.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top