- 9,982
- 10,821
So basically this
We don't assume any acceleration happening if we have assumed that constant velocity had taken place to find K.E. or that we don't assume constant acceleration at all due to not knowing the rate of change of velocity, but only constant velocity, yet I've seen many calcs (i wouldn't doubt that there are hundreds of them), in which users has calculated acc of an object despite having assumed constant velocity to find KE or has assumed constant acc. So i wanted to ask if it's just choice of preference or we strictly do abide by it? And if so, how we are supposed to get acceleration in such cases where object went from 0 to V velocity?
We don't assume any acceleration happening if we have assumed that constant velocity had taken place to find K.E. or that we don't assume constant acceleration at all due to not knowing the rate of change of velocity, but only constant velocity, yet I've seen many calcs (i wouldn't doubt that there are hundreds of them), in which users has calculated acc of an object despite having assumed constant velocity to find KE or has assumed constant acc. So i wanted to ask if it's just choice of preference or we strictly do abide by it? And if so, how we are supposed to get acceleration in such cases where object went from 0 to V velocity?
Last edited: