• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Acausality type 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
EldemadeDityjon

EldemadeDityjon

He/Him
Messages
20,419
Reaction score
15,932
Does Existing outside the system framework and free from casualty manipulation makes a character Acausality type 5.

I mean existing outside of complete reason itself.
 
ActuallySpaceMan said:
Mind giving a bit more context?
Click to expand...
A character exist outside of reason and system and unbound by Casualty. Does that make him/ her Acausality type 5.

Let's says A character is NEP type 2 which can't be affected by normal mean what if the character existence is even deeper than that and unbound by Casualty.
 
NIK_FARIS said:
Is this about MGK?
Click to expand...
Just Asking. Some people made a thread to Argue someone from certain verse having Acausality type 5 for same reason. I was just curious if unbound by Casualty makes a character Acausality type 5.
 
Nightmare_Bloodfallen said:
Just Asking. Some people made a thread to Argue someone from certain having Acausality type 5 for same reason. I was just curious if unbound by Casualty makes a character Acausality type 5.
Click to expand...
I can’t really answer for sure. I know order and reason is main thing in MGK which is why irregular like Anos and Graham is acausality type 4. If just normal causality then it definitely type 4 but if it really above all level of acausality then sure that type 5. Isn’t the NEP nature type 2 that he has is limited?
 
NIK_FARIS said:
I can’t really answer for sure. I know order and reason is main thing in MGK which is why irregular like Anos and Graham is acausality type 4. If just normal causality then it definitely type 4 but if it really above all level of acausality then sure that type 5. Isn’t the NEP nature type 2 that he has is limited?
Click to expand...
Well I am just wandering if existing outside the system and unbound by Casualty gives a character Acausality type 5.

BTW Tensura verse supporters Trying to update a character to Acausality type 5 with this. I was just curious if unbound by Casualty makes any character Acausality type 5.
 
Nightmare_Bloodfallen said:
Well I am just wandering if existing outside the system and unbound by Casualty gives a character Acausality type 5.

BTW Tensura verse supporters Trying to update a character to Acausality type 5 with this. I was just curious if unbound by Casualty makes any character Acausality type 5.
Click to expand...
Need more proof than just that actually. You doesn’t need to actually transcend causality to get acausality type 5. If the character exist outside of cause and effect in every level not just a normal one and has been consistently showing it in the story then it should qualify as acausality type 5 at least from what I understand.
 
NIK_FARIS said:
Need more proof than just that actually. You doesn’t need to actually transcend causality to get acausality type 5. If the character exist outside of cause and effect in every level not just a normal one and has been consistently showing it in the story then it should qualify as acausality type 5 at least from what I understand.
Click to expand...
Their reason was something like.

Veldanova created the verse. And his sister not affected by his brothers verse casuality.

How does this works?
 
Nightmare_Bloodfallen said:
Their reason was something like.

Veldanova created the verse. And his sister not affected by his brothers verse casuality.

How does this works?
Click to expand...
Sorry, I am not that exactly knowledgeable regarding tensura verse as a whole. It might be acausality 5 assuming if it correct? At the very least that person should have acausality type 4.
 
NIK_FARIS said:
Sorry, I am not that exactly knowledgeable regarding tensura verse as a whole. It might be acausality 5 assuming if it correct? At the very least that person should have acausality type 4.
Click to expand...
Yeah. I know it's atleast Acausality type 4. I was just wondering if that explanation is enough to gets accepted as Acausality type 5.
 
I really need more context to go on before I can make proper decision. It could possibly be acausality type 5 but it’s better if you ask someone in the tensura discussion thread if you still want to know the answer.
 
There is no such thing as acausality 5 in tensura for now even in mtl volume, neither there is any revision. There is only one guy who is not even a supporter made the thread using MTL and it was immediately rejected
 
091Franky said:
There is no such thing as acausality 5 in tensura for now even in mtl volume, neither there is any revision. There is only one guy who is not even a supporter made the thread using MTL and it was immediately rejected
Click to expand...
Oh, okay then
 
091Franky said:
There is no such thing as acausality 5 in tensura for now even in mtl volume, neither there is any revision. There is only one guy who is not even a supporter made the thread using MTL and it was immediately rejected
Click to expand...
Oh. Ok 👍

Anyway so completely existing outside of every Casualty gives any character Acausality type 5?
 
Nightmare_Bloodfallen said:
Just Asking. Some people made a thread to Argue someone from certain verse having Acausality type 5 for same reason. I was just curious if unbound by Casualty makes a character Acausality type 5.
Click to expand...
I think it need more context. If it unbound by Causality system but people still can interact with him, I think that is just Anti-Feats. Also if he is unbound by Causality system, it can be mean that the causality system is different from the world/verse.
Pretty sure that character with Acausality Type 5 is need a feats to interact with them.
(Correct Me If I Wrong :v)
 
MysteriousIza4416 said:
I think it need more context. If it unbound by Causality system but people still can interact with him, I think that is just Anti-Feats. Also if he is unbound by Causality system, it can be mean that the causality system is different from the world/verse.
Pretty sure that character with Acausality Type 5 is need a feats to interact with them.
(Correct Me If I Wrong :v)
Click to expand...
well, yes. If the person is acausality type 5 but can be interact by normal people, then that would be anti feat (which is the reason why desperado is acausal type 4). For type 5, You have to go to the same level existence in order to interact with it.
 
MysteriousIza4416 said:
I think it need more context. If it unbound by Causality system but people still can interact with him, I think that is just Anti-Feats. Also if he is unbound by Causality system, it can be mean that the causality system is different from the world/verse.
Pretty sure that character with Acausality Type 5 is need a feats to interact with them.
(Correct Me If I Wrong :v)
Click to expand...
NIK_FARIS said:
well, yes. If the person is acausality type 5 but can be interact by normal people, then that would be anti feat (which is the reason why desperado is acausal type 4). For type 5, You have to go to the same level existence in order to interact with it.
Click to expand...
I was wondering if a character has NEP type 2 which is Normally free from casualty. Then even that NEP type 2 gets destroyed still that character Exist in deeper. If that character can be considered as Acausality type 5.
 
I think you must get some proof that them is can't be interacted by reality

But in wiki say "normally may". So i think can't be to interacted is not absolute reason for get acausality type 5
Type 5: Causality Transcendence: Characters with this type of Acausality transcend the normal boundaries of cause and effect, existing outside of the causality of a system. Even interacting with them normally may prove virtually impossible.
Click to expand...
 
Fixxed said:
I think you must get some proof that them is can't be interacted by reality

But in wiki say "normally may". So i think can't be to interacted is not absolute reason for get acausality type 5
Click to expand...
Yeah, we had SMT characters with had insane RE to the point able to interact and fight acausality type 5
 
Fixxed said:
I think you must get some proof that them is can't be interacted by reality

But in wiki say "normally may". So i think can't be to interacted is not absolute reason for get acausality type 5
Click to expand...
Let me see. I think we need to wait for Official translation. Reading in MTL made me confused.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

FriendOfTheTeaParty
Acausality type 5 question
Replies
17
Views
1K
Arency
Arency
Can we interact with acausality type 5 through a higher dimension?
Replies
1
Views
470
Faridw
MSahla
  • Locked
Is this enough for layering?
Replies
12
Views
540
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
Acausality Question?
Replies
6
Views
400
Tyrone_Dawson
small question about acausality type 4
Replies
3
Views
656
AlipheeseXIV
AlipheeseXIV
Back
Top