• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Acausality question

712
430
The question is specifically about acausality type 4. Well, I know that acausality type 4 is about a different causality system. However, there are many causality systems out there. What about the situation of a character or realm whose causality is inverted? In theory, it would be very complicated to interact with a character of this nature because the effect comes before the cause, so in a hypothetical battle scenario, it becomes complicated. But to stop beating around the bush, my question is: does a character operating in an inverted causality system differ from another type 4 acausality character that is not exactly operating in inverted causality? You see, in fiction, there are many characters with type 4 acausality, but they do not operate in inverted causality, but rather in other strange systems, yet it is usually possible for any 'random' to interact. I would like to know how the wiki treats the differences between type 4 acausality characters, as the systems are quite different from each other, while some even a 'common human' can interact with, others are more complex.
 
Type 4 itself is madly varied (ranging from different to transcending the whole system), which I don't even think there is a "baseline" standard for Type 4 Acausality, tbh.

I'd just stick to the feat, I guess?

For the "can't be interacted with" part, I think it needs a feat, not just an assumption for this wikia's standards.
 
Type 4 itself is madly varied (ranging from different to transcending the whole system), which I don't even think there is a "baseline" standard for Type 4 Acausality, tbh.

I'd just stick to the feat, I guess?

For the "can't be interacted with" part, I think it needs a feat, not just an assumption for this wikia's standards.
Thank you for the reply. I understand the need for a feat and usually have it. If the work shows the difficulty of an "ordinary human" interacting with a being of inverted causality (this can be so severe that communication is impossible), I think that's enough. So in this case, how does a being of inverted causality fare against other type 4 acausal beings that are "simpler" than ordinary humans can interact with?
 
Thank you for the reply. I understand the need for a feat and usually have it. If the work shows the difficulty of an "ordinary human" interacting with a being of inverted causality (this can be so severe that communication is impossible), I think that's enough. So in this case, how does a being of inverted causality fare against other type 4 acausal beings that are "simpler" than ordinary humans can interact with?
I genuinely have no idea.

Tbh, this is the first time I've heard stuff like "inverted causality", mayhaps DT can answer you that, so better ping him in his walls.
 
Back
Top