- 6,033
- 871
This is a pretty simple question. I've been told that when we know a crater's diameter, but not its depth because it is not possible to discern it, we assume it is 13% of the diameter based on some real life Lunar craters.
But what about the inverse where we know the depth, but not the diameter? Do we quantify the diameter by doing the opposite? Or is there another way we quantify this?
But what about the inverse where we know the depth, but not the diameter? Do we quantify the diameter by doing the opposite? Or is there another way we quantify this?
