• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

A void and something about all potentialities tiering question

TheUnshakableOne

She/Her
VS Battles
Retired
6,452
1,667
Simply put I'm just curious what tier this cosmology is

Here is the rundown on it

1.) This Void is the ultimate reality.

2.) It shapes all reality including all universes in the multiverse

3.) To actually view this ultimate reality. You need to achieve a state of being that transcends the time as well as space, go beyond the universe, and some higher dimensional membrane that isn't well elaborated. Once then you can see it

4.) This Void, ultimate reality, is also the Primordial chaos that created everything

5.) Its states to exist as an indifferentiated state that carries the ability to create all potentialities

6.) By Void, I mean a state of nothingness. The Ultimate reality is that all things at the most fundamental level even more fundamental than concepts are empty and nothing at all. Nothing actually exist.
 
Simply put I'm just curious what tier this cosmology is

Here is the rundown on it

1.) This Void is the ultimate reality.

2.) It shapes all reality including all universes in the multiverse

3.) To actually view this ultimate reality. You need to achieve a state of being that transcends the time as well as space, go beyond the universe, and some higher dimensional membrane that isn't well elaborated. Once then you can see it

4.) This Void, ultimate reality, is also the Primordial chaos that created everything

5.) Its states to exist as an indifferentiated state that carries the ability to create all potentialities

6.) By Void, I mean a state of nothingness. The Ultimate reality is that all things at the most fundamental level even more fundamental than concepts are empty and nothing at all. Nothing actually exist.
Would be minimum 1-A, but if point 3 and the state of "being that transcends time and space, beyond the universe etc" is elaborated upon, it may reach even higher.
Additionally, if the cosmology has some sort of R>F, even if its not a 1-A>Non 1-A kind[because it can be a lower level too, for example, something that is fiction to the baseline non 1-A reality yet still exists in its own sense inside the verse], it can also go higher than just 1-A.
 
Would be minimum 1-A, but if point 3 and the state of "being that transcends time and space, beyond the universe etc" is elaborated upon, it may reach even higher.
Additionally, if the cosmology has some sort of R>F, even if its not a 1-A>Non 1-A kind[because it can be a lower level too, for example, something that is fiction to the baseline non 1-A reality yet still exists in its own sense inside the verse], it can also go higher than just 1-A.
Rephrase that please?

I think I misunderstood what your trying to say
 
Rephrase that please?

I think I misunderstood what your trying to say
First things first, it would be 1-A.

Second off, it could be higher than 1-A depending on if this thing[the bolded parts] as some more context:
3.) To actually view this ultimate reality. You need to achieve a state of being that transcends the time as well as space, go beyond the universe, and some higher dimensional membrane that isn't well elaborated. Once then you can see it
For example:
A way of "viewing" something is to become one with it.
A way to "achieve" a state of nothingness is by being reduced to nothingness yourself.
"Transcends", when taken as a qualitative transcendence, can also very well be the lack of space-time[which comes by one's nature of being beyond it], which results in a kind of nonexistence. A 1-A Void of nothingness as described in the BDE page is a good example.

For the latter part, I meant that if a verse has some form of Reality>Fiction transcendence, and then there's some monad-type [undifferentiated whole] character, as you've said in the OP, then the latter[ultimate reality] can be High 1-A even if the Reality>Fiction transcendence is not between a 1-A and a Non 1-A, and simply a Non 1-A[for example, a Low 2-C universe] and something that's fictional to even that[qualitatively inferior.

This is mainly because the genus/quality/distinction that distinguishes 1-A from Non 1-A[that is, the quality of R>F] is also the same quality that distinguishes baseline reality[let's say Low 2-C] from something qualitatively inferior.
I think this would serve as an example of what I mean by "Qualitatively inferior".
The "Story" or inside of the painting here would be something qualitatively inferior to even baseline reality.

Source for the High 1-A logic: Ultima's sandbox
 
Rephrase that please?

I think I misunderstood what your trying to say
First things first, it would be 1-A.

Second off, it could be higher than 1-A depending on if this thing[the bolded parts] as some more context:
3.) To actually view this ultimate reality. You need to achieve a state of being that transcends the time as well as space, go beyond the universe, and some higher dimensional membrane that isn't well elaborated. Once then you can see it
For example:
A way of "viewing" something is to become one with it.
A way to "achieve" a state of nothingness is by being reduced to nothingness yourself.
"Transcends", when taken as a qualitative transcendence, can also very well be the lack of space-time[which comes by one's nature of being beyond it], which results in a kind of nonexistence. A 1-A Void of nothingness as described in the BDE page is a good example.

For the latter part, I meant that if a verse has some form of Reality>Fiction transcendence, and then there's some monad-type [undifferentiated whole] character, as you've said in the OP, then the latter[ultimate reality] can be High 1-A even if the Reality>Fiction transcendence is not between a 1-A and a Non 1-A, and simply a Non 1-A[for example, a Low 2-C universe] and something that's fictional to even that[qualitatively inferior.

This is mainly because the genus/quality/distinction that distinguishes 1-A from Non 1-A[that is, the quality of R>F] is also the same quality that distinguishes baseline reality[let's say Low 2-C] from something qualitatively inferior.
I think this would serve as an example of what I mean by "Qualitatively inferior".
The "Story" or inside of the painting here would be something qualitatively inferior to even baseline reality.

Source for the High 1-A logic: Ultima's sandbox
 
3.) To actually view this ultimate reality. You need to achieve a state of being that transcends the time as well as space, go beyond the universe, and some higher dimensional membrane that isn't well elaborated. Once then you can see it
Pretty sure this disqualifies 1-A since you're going through a higher dimensional brane (a concept in physics) to reach this level of reality.
 
1-A.
yea. it's just low 1-A since that membrane stuff really kills 1-A.
Not exactly. Dimensions can be defined differently according to the verse, unless it is in an actual strict scientific context.
 
1-A.

Not exactly. Dimensions can be defined differently according to the verse, unless it is in an actual strict scientific context.
What if the author states they got there inspiration from real life higher dimensional physics and they hoped they portrayed it right for the story?
 
What if the author states they got there inspiration from real life higher dimensional physics and they hoped they portrayed it right fir the story?
That's not really related to what I'm talking about. That's actually entirely different
 
What if the author states they got there inspiration from real life higher dimensional physics and they hoped they portrayed it right for the story?
Low 2-C since the size of the extra-dimensional membrane wasn't specified.
 
Back
Top