• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

1-A+ Question

ActuallySpaceMan42

ActuallySpaceMan42

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
Messages
7,610
Reaction score
8,267
If a being completely transcends a 1-A Realm and its beings to the point from their perspective those beings are fictional, are they 1-A+?
 
It would be High 1-A if the nature of transcendence is the same as the 1-As are to High 1-Bs. Being above them is usually just 1-A+, but if no amount of traditional layers or strength increases can get the 1-As on the level as the other entity then they would be High 1-A.

So maybe idk.
 
Qawsedf234 said:
It would be High 1-A if the nature of transcendence is the same as the 1-As are to High 1-Bs. Being above them is usually just 1-A+, but if no amount of traditional layers or strength increases can get the 1-As on the level as the other entity then they would be High 1-A.

So maybe idk.
Click to expand...
What exactly do you mean by the nature of transcendence?
 
ActuallySpaceMan said:
What exactly do you mean by the nature of transcendence?
Click to expand...
  • Low 1-A is equated to ℵ1 in the Cantor number set of all real numbers
  • 1-A is ℵ2 and on in Cantor sets
  • High 1-A a Large Cardnial of ω+1 and on
It means that a High 1-A cannot be reached in any capacity by a 1-A. Not amount of layers added to a Cantor Set can reach a Large Cardinal in a similar way that there's an infinite amount of numbers between 2 and 3 but none of those infinite numbers can ever reach 4.

So in order to get High 1-A you need to prove that the entity is beyond a 1-A system in the same capacity the 1-A system is beyond a High 1-B system. Where no amount of upscaling or higher numbers will allow a High 1-B hierarchy to reach a 1-A hierarchy.
 
Qawsedf234 said:
  • Low 1-A is equated to ℵ1 in the Cantor number set of all real numbers
  • 1-A is ℵ2 and on in Cantor sets
  • High 1-A a Large Cardnial of ω+1 and on
It means that a High 1-A cannot be reached in any capacity by a 1-A. Not amount of layers added to a Cantor Set can reach a Large Cardinal in a similar way that there's an infinite amount of numbers between 2 and 3 but none of those infinite numbers can ever reach 4.

So in order to get High 1-A you need to prove that the entity is beyond a 1-A system in the same capacity the 1-A system is beyond a High 1-B system. Where no amount of upscaling or higher numbers will allow a High 1-B hierarchy to reach a 1-A hierarchy.
Click to expand...
Ah, I see that's a big gap. So Infinitely Transcending and looking down a Boundless Realm that is Infinitely larger than a 1-A Realm is just one level higher of Baseline right?
 
ActuallySpaceMan said:
So Infinitely Transcending and looking down a Boundless Realm that is Infinitely larger than a 1-A Realm is just one level higher of Baseline right?
Click to expand...
It would be 1-A+ on two levels based on that description
  • 1-A = Base layer
  • 1-A+ = Layer bigger than base layer
  • 1-A+ = Entity bigger than layer bigger than base layer
 
ActuallySpaceMan said:
Cool and Transcending along with viewing a Boundless Realm as fictional that is Infinitely Larger than a Baseline 1-A Realm is 1-A+ like above right?
Click to expand...
Viewing a realm that is infinitely larger than baseline 1-A as fiction = 1-A+. I believe this is your question. Honestly it would would still be one level above baseline 1-A. 1-A works like 1-B. Well 1-A+ are just layers above baseline
 
Last edited:
Lormac_CC said:
Viewing a realm that is infinitely larger than baseline 1-A as fiction = 1-A+. I believe this is your question. Honestly it would would still be one level above baseline 1-A. 1-A works like 1-B. Well 1-A+ is just layers above baseline
Click to expand...
Oh well, now I'm confused again, so what Qawsedf234 said was wrong?
 
Lormac_CC said:
Nope
Click to expand...
So you have a base 1-A Realm and then a Boundless Realm Infinitely bigger than sed 1-A Realm and then a being who transcends that Boundless Realm Infinitely seeing it as fiction. He said that was 1-A+ you're saying it's just a layer above baseline.
 
Only transcends baseline 1-A it's not meaning you become 1-A+ or above baseline 1-A. Its only still baseline 1-A but higher
 
Qawsedf234 said:
  • Low 1-A is equated to ℵ1 in the Cantor number set of all real numbers
  • 1-A is ℵ2 and on in Cantor sets
  • High 1-A a Large Cardnial of ω+1 and on
It means that a High 1-A cannot be reached in any capacity by a 1-A. Not amount of layers added to a Cantor Set can reach a Large Cardinal in a similar way that there's an infinite amount of numbers between 2 and 3 but none of those infinite numbers can ever reach 4.

So in order to get High 1-A you need to prove that the entity is beyond a 1-A system in the same capacity the 1-A system is beyond a High 1-B system. Where no amount of upscaling or higher numbers will allow a High 1-B hierarchy to reach a 1-A hierarchy.
Click to expand...
interesting, I know that this is a late reply, but question, I heard that a cantor set would be just as big as a cardinality, would a cardinal number that is uncountably infinite be the same or relatively similar to inaccessible cardinal?
 
CNBA3 said:
but question, I heard that a cantor set would be just as big as a cardinality, would a cardinal number that is uncountably infinite be the same or relatively similar to inaccessible cardinal?
Click to expand...
No. Aleph-Infinite is still smaller than a Large Cardinal in our system.
 
Qawsedf234 said:
No. Aleph-Infinite is still smaller than a Large Cardinal in our system.
Click to expand...
Actually just want one last clarification, sorry to bother you, in that sense if a cantor set/cardinality that is uncountably infinite would just be Outerversal+?
 
CNBA3 said:
in that sense if a cantor set/cardinality that is uncountably infinite would just be Outerversal+?
Click to expand...
Cantor without further context is just 1-A. You would need to prove an infinite set of Cantor sets to get 1-A+
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AnimesFreak2
Concept Type 1 Question layers?
Replies
8
Views
517
AnimesFreak2
AnimesFreak2
Eikichi_Sensei
Question about concepts.
Replies
2
Views
856
Eikichi_Sensei
Eikichi_Sensei
What is the deal with layers
Replies
1
Views
615
Ushiromiya_Quaza
HakutoRei000
1-A anti feats question.
Replies
4
Views
853
HakutoRei000
HakutoRei000
Would this structure potentially qualify for H1-A+?
Replies
4
Views
294
Tyrone_Dawson
Back
Top