1-A disqualifier stuff

[BreezeHM]

From the Tiering System FAQ:

The first practical effect of this fact is that the power of a 1-A character cannot be dispersed so much that it reaches into a lower tier. Since there is no conceivable extension of any lower tier that can yield equality to a 1-A structure, neither can there be any subdivision (Even an infinite subdivision) of 1-A that reduces down into such tiers. Unless, of course, this division is somehow non-quantitative in nature (i.e. The results of the division are not actually numerical "chunks" of the character's power); however, this should be made reasonably clear by statements or through background context.

Let's say you had a being that was originally 1-A. The being died and reincarnated later as just a regular human. The being still has the source of their power, however it's no longer 1-A. They gradually increase their strength, and eventually enter one of their "old shrines" that has power from when they were still alive. The being absorbed the power left in the shrine, which allowed them to contend with 1-A beings.

Does this go against 1-A?

 

[Napoleondevious]

If by "enter one of theor old shirne" you mean adcend back to 1-A, i dont think it is a disqualifier since it is amped from the vestige of his power which were originally 1-A (since it acts like being amped by 1-A beings)
Assuming "source of their power" is the original one

 

[BreezeHM]

If by "enter one of theor old shirne" you mean adcend back to 1-A, i dont think it is a disqualifier since it is amped from the vestige of his power which were originally 1-A (since it acts like being amped by 1-A beings)
Assuming "source of their power" is the original one

The being ascending back to 1-A using that power wouldn't be a disqualifier. I'm mainly referring to the power that the being is using after their reincarnation. Since that Power was originally 1-A, but is now in the Tier 4 ranges.

A 1-A cannot be broken down into smaller parts that results in a lower tier. It's never stated that they're just using fragments of their power though, but they did restore their 1-A status after entering the shrine and absorbing their original power back.

 

[Reiner04]

I think this pretty much answers ur question;

On the matter of power sources: That would depend on the nature of the power source itself. For example, a common trope in fiction is power sources that, so to speak, are "for the taking," meaning they are naturally self-diffusive and don't offer any resistance whatsoever to being tapped into, as being utilized in such a way is in their nature. Drawing power from such sources is obviously not actually an anti-feat for them being 1-A, especially so if they are depicted as naturally connected to, and united with, the beings that tap into them.

However, if the "power source" in question consists in a lower character literally overwhelming a would-be 1-A object with their own abilities and forcibly absorbing it into themselves, then that constitutes an anti-feat, unless the occasion falls under the stipulations above.

 

[BreezeHM]

I think this pretty much answers ur question;

Perfect, now to drop wank
https://cdn.**********.com/emojis/1022988744275525653.webp?size=128

 

[Fixxed]

Let's say you had a being that was originally 1-A. The being died and reincarnated later as just a regular human. The being still has the source of their power, however it's no longer 1-A. They gradually increase their strength, and eventually enter one of their "old shrines" that has power from when they were still alive. The being absorbed the power left in the shrine, which allowed them to contend with 1-A beings.

It sound like reduction, it not matter if their source of power still 1A, but if his entire being including every aspect of his being reduce to non-1A it literally was an anti feats

But if he "save" his power his true power and that power still 1A, i think it was not anti feats. As long as there exist at least one that remain 1A, and he get back his 1A self by that

 

[BreezeHM]

snip

It sound like reduction, it not matter if their source of power still 1A, but if his entire being including every aspect of his being reduce to non-1A it literally was an anti feats

But if he "save" his power his true power and that power still 1A, i think it was not anti feats. As long as there exist at least one that remain 1A, and he get back his 1A self by that

deal with this Wanker

 

[Reiner04]

deal with this Wanker

Fixed is referring to him being reincarnated as human in human world amd his source of power being reduced to that level. Which can indeed be problematic unless, the source of power after he reincarnated was different than when he was still alive.

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

wouldn't the 1-A Object or his power not exist in lower reality though as part of the can 3D have 1-A Physical?

After all 1-A energy wholeness cannot truly exist in lower reality

Unless that object is more so a pathway to his formerself rather than his actual power condensed in a shrine

 

[BreezeHM]

wouldn't the 1-A Object or his power not exist in lower reality though as part of the can 3D have 1-A Physical?

After all 1-A energy wholeness cannot truly exist in lower reality

Unless that object is more so a pathway to his formerself rather than his actual power condensed in a shrine

That is true, however in this case, the power is their existence itself, so it would probably be fine.

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

That is true, however in this case, the power is their existence itself, so it would probably be fine.

Yeah but you cannot really grow towards 1-A reality or Degrade from 1-A to 3D.

This is covered in the Whether a 1-A Being can be brought down to 3D existence. Because if their power is 1-A the wielder must also have an existence equivalent to 1-A to wield it in the first place.
so it being weaker acts as a counterargument to this if it really still his power but no longer 1-A. It must either be a Facismile of his real power and not his real power to go around this True R>F interaction without violating the qualifiers