This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Better question why, it definitely wasn't because it was true no offical source has ever said such a thing they only did it because of the anime only content from Z that is sometimes referenced in filler, content that was by and large made by Toriyama.
Ya... even in the context of prime I seriously doubt sonic actually felt like, a universe sized blast from that. It tore reality apart instead of destroying it, in the context of the narrative anyway
I found the thread and have read through it, it dosen't really change the scaling at all just the terminology-
Has anything else changed in the last year or so I should know about? (I promise I've asked this before)
me not knowing it just ment I was using the wrong terminology, for example it is a fact the shatter verse unis are low 2-C by the wikis standards no matter what interpatation you use, I was incorrectly talking about the possibility of them being high 3-A
reading the staff statements the change is actually far reaching; it made it so anything scaling down from a baseline feat in tier 2 and above are actually the higher tier not only is the beerus and champa punching clash tier 2 even with low 2 unis, if the same feat was applied with 100 people...
this thread omega sent that I read through, he did change how it works and from an analytical standpoint the change makes sense https://vsbattles.com/threads/half-2-c-is-against-the-standards-and-should-be-eliminated.150055/
the only thing I was arguing aganst what 2-C shatterverse. Not 2-C sonic
I was aurging 6 times smaller then low 2-C was high 3-A. The Last time I regularly use the wiki I would have been correct.
Your friend literally made the revision that made that untrue
Let's be hypothetical and say a universe shattered into 100 peices and we have no more context for it then that, by the changes the other guy made to the tiering system all 100 of those fragmentation would be low 2-C, yet there...
I'm sorry if I caused you distress but I'm not going to just roll over to there points if I don't think there logically correct. I can tell things are getting heated so I'll drop this here and prepare a revision, and things can continue there.
This is what I got from the thread,
Things that scale down from baseline low 2-C or high tiers are ranked by the higher tier, this is because the gaps at this point are all essentially infinte, as such it makes more sense to rate them by the end they are finitely close too
The only thing I...
I simply wasn't aware of a change.
I do this because I love sonic seeing something I consider wrong with a franchise I love hurts. You can think that means I downplay it, I want things to be right and logical.
Created by one reality shattering into several, the assumption is that they are smaller then what they shattered from, and together make up what they shattered from. They could easy be discirbed as universes smaller then a normal one each one 6th the size of a normal universe. Simply using the...
It takes more then one person to have a discussion, I really appreciate making me out to be a problem, if you didn't like that discussion happening here you could have asked it to be taken to messages or another thread made for it.
I found the justification for it making the main universe 2-C didn't make sense to me and noone here has convinced me otherwise. I'm probably going to make a revision thread unless I see some other evidence
No as the other guy says high 3-A also includes none universe sized 4D constructs, it was removed from the tiering system due to being seen as redundant information sense anything below baseline low 2-C would he high 3-A by default (I was against this I knew this would happen but it went how it...
Your proof for that is the Shatterverse. It's only proven to be 2-C if the shatter verse realitys are low 2-C which the default assumption for them is then being high 3-A unless proven otherwise as only them being low 2-C would prove the main universe to be 2-C, in other words this aurgment is...
I disagree. Literally the only assumption necessarily is that the word universe developed naturally in there reality and they don't somehow have access to OG's Eggman's memorys sense he would know the difference.
Where as to assume they do know what there talking about requires them to have...
Very big false equivalence, our universe wasn't created by 1 reality separating into 6. The default assumption is that each of these 6 realitys are lesser then a universe unless proven otherwise.
The eggman can't know there reality is lesser then a normal universe without an outside...
I disagree. Assuming they have the frame of refence beaides there own realtity necessary to know if there reality is a proper universe is what requires far too many assumptions.
Edit: In fact it's explicitly not the case in the text of the show sense they don't know about dimensional travel...