• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Search results for query: *

  1. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Existence Erasure

    venom makes sense. i also agree with sera. it should be described in relation to the power its applied from. it makes sese considering how vague this specific power can in my opinion.
  2. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Existence Erasure

    everything seems solid to me. i just can't choose who to agree with in this debate between DT and messiah. mainly because i don't think i have full understanding of their argument. i'll read this thread again before giving input. so from my understanding messiah is saying that existence...
  3. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    @ZERO im not sure if the basic idea of how it works is clear for us. as far as i know we can only go by examples since this is a topic beyond our human understanding (or at least my own mediocre understanding).
  4. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    oh ok.
  5. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    also why is there a removed reply ? this thread getting out of hand already ?
  6. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    @Ven @Dragon yes i just noticed that (was busy typing my comment) and i do stand corrected. my bad.
  7. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    @Matt its shouldn't. 2-A are incapable of what we're speaking of in this thread so this topic in that thread shouldn't be disccused. its either an outlier statement or these mofos are outerversal and we just downplay like we're famous for in other communities lol.
  8. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    @Venom ah, ok. you see, the way you worded your first comment, it seemed you were trying to say that azathoth didn't create the unnamed darkness and its something that existed along side azathoth from the begining, or even pre-dates azathoth so i got confused for a second there.
  9. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    i just noticed something. why is this on the content revision board ? shouldn't this be in the "questions and answers" section ? anyway, @Venom didn't azathoth spawn the unnamed darkness along with the nameless mist ?
  10. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Nonexistence Erasure

    you yourself can be erased from nonexistence (maybe to an even higher level of nonexistence but thats all hypothetical) but you can't erase nonexistene itself if thats what you're asking. and thats my understanding hope it helped.
  11. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    if DT is for any reason too busy we can ask a staff member to just copy paste his recent comment maybe ? though i think DT will reply whenever he can
  12. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    opps. took me way too long to write my comment. since i didn't refresh the page i couldn't know sera sent a reply. in that case since there seems to be no rejection to this. now all that is left is to wait for DT to edit the pages correct ?
  13. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    Sera seemed interested in this thread so she might give her opinion but something happened and delayed her ? i think we should wait for her response and if not, then we can only trust DT's word for it and add this to the conceptual manipulation page since he is a very knowledgable wiki member...
  14. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    @Ant sorry to hear that ant. at least im hoping its not exhausting for you. as for the explanation from DT, it is very reasonable and there is nothing to argue against in my opinion. though i think its best we should wait for some staff and members input and maybe ask sera if he, she, it (?)...
  15. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    @DontTalk The "levels" of conceptual manipulation also looks fine to me. And this seems fine to me. the resoning and conditions. Though i don't really see the point of the second condinition since its so rare, i know no examples of but it might be more common than i think it is so i might be...
  16. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    @Monarch Laciel creating a new concept is what qualifies as "creating a new concept"if you create a universe then said universe possesses the same concepts like time and spacefrom the multiverse this universe originates from. there is no new concept created like negative anti mass or anytrhing...
  17. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    @Sera From my understanding, a group of members apprarently are trying to upgrade their favorite characters by creating or proposing to create unnecessary powers that'd be just waste the time for the staff to add in my opinion. Conceptual manipulation is a power that need explanation...
  18. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    @Ant So they just try to pitch an idea for a new power to buff a character/characters they like ? Seems quite unnecessary but i think we should wait for DT to give his opinion on this. If he thinks its required i don't think there is a point in arguing against him. Though i do have my...
  19. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Conceptual creation

    hmm. i don't see anything wrong here. can't argue against what DT is trying to push but the thing is, shouldn't all of this just be a given ? like to me at the very least, even though i by no means even consider myself experienced in this topic know about this enough to where i wouldn't really...
  20. A_fan_of_a_fan

    VS Battles visitor statistics update

    damn dude. VS wiki lets go. and hopefully that'll double sooner than later. very tired of people shuning my arguments just because i ocasionally use this site. heck someone even refused to argue with me because i use this tiering system, you know, the same system everyone with a functioning...
  21. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Over 100000 total Wikia/Fandom edits

    my reply was removed ? smh, i guess i had it comming. in any regards Congratulations ant on this amazing mile stone, i on the behalf of everyone that couldn't see this post aplaude you for your hard work for hours and hours each day everyday, you're an example to be looked at by everyone in...
  22. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Chronos (SMITE) vs. hades (saint seiya)

    ...be 50%) an unlimited supply of 3K pots (grant 25% extra power and 50 physical and magical protections) and rituals ok with everything being said lets f***ing gooooooooooo PS. if you're unaware of how some of the stats work with the items i've given chronos i can give you a short explanation.
  23. A_fan_of_a_fan

    What would happen to the tiering system if normal human tier will change?

    ok but what if said development was to happen through evolution and as such its the new baseline for humans ?
  24. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    @Kaltias i see. thank you sir.
  25. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    @Ant yes about that, closing a thread is a staff only feature correct ? the person who made the thread can't simply close it right ? just asking for the future.
  26. A_fan_of_a_fan

    DBZ speed downgrade (severe)

    @Dragonmasterxyz alrighty then, i'll see myself out, though i do disagree with this downgrade since we have scaling.
  27. A_fan_of_a_fan

    DBZ speed downgrade (severe)

    @Roy its not easy to exactly quantify yes but it can be scaled rather easily from some feats and statements. @Matthew what outlier ?
  28. A_fan_of_a_fan

    DBZ speed downgrade (severe)

    @RadicalMrR that example you gave was travel feat which is very low in DB in general untill super came out while combat speed in DB is far greater. i also believe that you're not factoring in the fact that goku slept on his was back from the snake way.
  29. A_fan_of_a_fan

    DBZ speed downgrade (severe)

    what about picolo's at least sub rel/possibly light speed feat ? the one where his beam reached the moon in seconds and raditz was able to dodge a similar ray at point blank
  30. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    i feel proud of myself after this thread, yey.
  31. A_fan_of_a_fan

    DBZ speed downgrade (severe)

    @Ant well the true size is unkown an im unaware of such a calc but to give you a scale to start with earth in DB is considered as a small planet when compared to others and namek is considered a large planet. also as a general question, this downgrade is for travel speed not combat speed...
  32. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    @Ant This is reasonable to me but i think we should wait for azathoth and DontTalk to input their opinions
  33. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    @Ant I did make a suggestion in this thread yesterday if you haven't checked my comment yet.
  34. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    you didn't get my question
  35. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    @DontTalk that sounds reasonable thank you for the input DontTalk. so its basically just like what azathoth said right ? also it would be cool if the 2-A rating was changed to what you wrote, or i have a better idea, the high 1-B rating has a note that states Take note that even if a character...
  36. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    i don't think it is possible. how can you denote it as being 4D if you're saying it doesn't have a 4D continuum ?
  37. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    i guess we'll wait then.
  38. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    very well then i see no point in continuing this discussion, thank you all very much for the input
  39. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    @Azathoth so from what i understand is that if its refered to as just infinity then its 2-A but if its specifically stated to be an uncountable set then it qualifies for at least 2-A or possibly high 2-A correct ?
  40. A_fan_of_a_fan

    Does destroying a more than countably infinite number of universes qualify for a low 1-C rating ?

    alright i understand now, thank you both for the explanation but azathoth to make sure that we're on the same page, if i destroyed a more than countably infinite number of universes would that give me a 2-A or an at least 2-A rating ? and since in either case it won't put me in anything higher...
Back
Top