This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The rule doesn't, and this is a heavy repeat offender violating basic common sense. Not to mention the problems with the CRT (adding an unapproved calc to an OP without noting such) that is further in bad faith.
As said earlier, it's nothing severe, but given BigSmoke's history and how it would...
I am willing to settle for him simply not making Breaking Bad versus threads anymore. That is remarkably lenient and doesn't even address the problems with his CRTs.
I don't think it should take a lot of explaining why putting Saul (who, by SBA, is willing to kill and not interested in giving up just because the battle seems unwinnable - thus ruining the entire thread from the get-go) against Goku is a bad idea.
This is the most important part, so I'll just address this. I currently do not believe it is allowed, simply enough. If you plan on making a thread to clarify, feel free to do so, but that still doesn't address using unapproved calcs on CRTs.
And again, it's Saul Goodman vs. Goku, I do not need...
I... was talking to Agnaa. The line directly above said it was Agnaa I was responding to. Please, read my posts before commenting before telling me to "shut up".
Also, it's definitely not okay to be using unapproved calcs on CRTs, either! This entire topic is a landmine of "things you should...
Also, I'm not going to respond to all of what BigSmoke said, but it's simply wrong. As someone who has actually watched Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul, I can confidently say that Saul Goodman has zero feats of dealing with talking some random guy who has a set intent to kill him with zero...
I get the impression you aren't too aware of Better Call Saul from the phrasing of your posts.
The rules do not leave enough wiggle room for that, and 'social influencing' is not grounds for mind control.
I'll keep this concise: Agnaa, if you want to fix the standards, fix them. Your arguments...
It's not within arguable range whatsoever, the feat used as reference for how Saul 'could win' was when dealing with someone who didn't particularly intend to kill him to begin with. On top of that, the circumstances were wildly different and were dealing with someone Saul could at least...
I have no ******* idea, the entire upgrade is so incredibly wrong on every count that I can't even grasp why people allowed it.
Given the mass of how wrong everything was, I simply want to revert all the changes (as that'll be easier when editing the pages) and move from there.
I would like to officially warn BigSmoke for his input on Breaking Bad threads, namely, two separate threads literally putting Saul Goodman against literally ******* Goku, one made immediately after I closed the first one.
For the record, no, simply because Saul is a lawyer doesn't mean he can...
Not most of it, however.
The most recent 'upgrade' that moved Walt, Jesse, and a few others to Tier 9-C is completely improper.
For one, Jesse doesn't scale to Tuco. This is really obvious, I shouldn't have to say this. Jesse gets absolutely mauled by Tuco in raw strength multiple times and...
I could've sworn that I saw .3 above .25. My bad, in that case.
Regardless, I bring this up because we can't really use exact multipliers without explicit canonical multipliers (which I cannot remember there being any). Saying they upscale is fine, but unless we have a reason for a specific...
For the same reasons I said "cope harder" is not a response to be inserted into a serious debate, responding with "tl:dr?" is also not a proper response. Let's not, please.
That is fine. Just be sure to reign it in a bit when responding to claims you find outrageous (and obviously make sure we have no more katakana misunderstandings, lol).
To be blunt, it's a very complicated matter and we have had an overwhelming amount of problems with people either intentionally or accidentally mistranslating matters. What Ed said, however, was not a call to ban all translations by non-Japanese people, as you put it. The point was that, because...
Fujiwara, that wasn't implied at all. It was very clearly a statement that debating the meaning of Japanese statements should best be done by people proficient in the Japanese language, which your earlier reply appearing to not understand katakana made relevant.
Your point afterwards, in...
I prefer a case-by-case analysis in that regard. In this situation, they are explicitly able to directly and at-will summon all Pokemon (including man-made ones), and you could argue that the Plates and similar is supporting evidence in that regard. Maybe neither point on it's own is enough, but...
No offense to anyone on this thread, but most points have been generally redundant and similar from the beginning. Having been here from the start, I have a general opinion on all this information, and I still think it would be best to relegate the Plates as supporting evidence (due to their...