This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Sekarang gw juga santai aja kalo buat masalah debat mah. Udah hampir gak peduli sama ini forum. Yang buat gw balik hari ini adalah ada orang yang like post gw satu tahun yang lalu.
This is not a proper revision. You need to state "what to change, add, or remove" in addition with "proof/scan/statement" and an explanation of "why tho?".
Outlier is subjective anyway. Just look at the recent DB Roshi upgrade. It was outlier at first, then it was not. Even then, some people including staff still think it is outlier, but outvoted.
There are many other example,but meh.
We don't do that here. That's the same as claiming the creator of a certain universe get everything that exist there.
While technically that might be true, but at the same time is super NLF without proof of having them.
Also Tatsuya Shiba for 9C. His profile is kinda incomplete, so i don't really know how he compare to others, but almost everything on his profile is based on info manip.
While I agree with Glass, I partially agree with Earl as well. From how many revision goes, it seems that gameplay is only canon when it benefit the verse...
This thread isn't progressing anywhere though.
I agree with Ultima tbh. We don't treat EE like that right? Otherwise a lot of people would receive High-Godly simply regenerating via universal EE.
For the sake of clarity, I will elaborate.
If you get a certain feats because it is specified (e.g. past, present, future), then it is fine...
https://vsbattles.com/threads/im-dumb-spacetime-confusion-or-rather-tiering-confusion.109604/post-3422839
No definite answer though and i kinda give up because lost of interest.
Well, vsbw seems to take USA approach with how the election went (electoral votes triumph all). Don't turn my word to political shit, it's just for comparison.
Anyway, not active in debate or crt anymore (not really invested to begin with). I just stay for the drama. Sometimes seeing people...
I guess it's more of Environmental Destruction like Methuselah. If the concept of darkness is gone, all creation will collapse. As fir the dimensional, it depends on what is destroyed to begin with.
Sorry no link, to lazy to make one with how the forum works.
"These concepts must exist prior to and after the existence of any object of the concept."
From the ongoing conceptual manipulation, it seems like this line will be added to type 2 as well.
"It should be noted that the ability to interact with souls and other non-corporeal entities directly as if they were physical objects is usually considered Non-Physical Interaction and does not grant the user the ability to manipulate souls in other contexts." - Under soul manipulation.
The...
EE is not based on damage. You're prolly mistaking it for physical vaporization. If Tosen Hado is merely vaporization based on AP, he shouldn't have EE in the first place.
Dude, what? GER is passive as well (or automatic?)
Even with passive, doesn't mean the opponent can instantly win. It depends on the power. But yeah passive gives big advantage.
And we go back to square one, does Genm have passive or something?