This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
He asked for it to be applied. I also would have rathered more discourse, but if the dude wants it quick, I won't be complained to for not doing it quick.
That isn't a calculable feat on its own, could be any number of means over any amount of time.
Mary destroyed the building over a short timeframe (a song), in-the-moment destruction would only yield 9-B or so.
Maybe, for the grenade.
Auditor doesn't really have much in the way of feats, he just seems to Matter Manipulate everything for destruction, and otherwise shows good mindhax, telekinesis, etc.
Deity could have something. Destroyed a barn, pre-emptively estimating that at 9-A.
Mary would be Low 7-B Environmental...
Alright, I actually read all of them. I've seen one of these before, it was good. They're all good, actually. I'm not really a comic guy but things like this are fun.
What in particular are you wanting to scale for them?
I am sorry that your parents are in pain, and that life has you stressed. That much I can sympathize with.
Still, our rules are as they are, and stand for everyone, and you have broken them time and time again. Perhaps a month or two off would be good for all parties. It would give you some...
I can see deleted messages, Joe. And it's just more of the same twisting-of-words.
I don't want anyone gone, Joe. I want you to mean it when you apologize. I want your apologies to hold some semblance of actual meaning. I want you to stop doing the thing you keep doing, and then pretending...
Joe.
You're being a hypocrite.
You are trying to use things you found in the past offensive to demean Armor, while trying to prevent him from mentioning that people were wrong, you are not a longstanding well-behaving member, that you have been banned for similar shit. Your own digging into...
Swearing isn't a rule violation! But it is dishonest to complain about other people swearing when you yourself are swearing!
In fact you even swore in the thing you linked to ("ffs"). I don't have an issue with swearing. I swear constantly, **** is a comma in my mind. I have a problem with lying.
Yeah, that doesn't change anything though, especially when you keep on acting vaguely rude and insulting all throughout, and go on to ignore their votes. An apology is only worthwhile if it marks a change in behavior. You didn't change. You swore and you lied and now you're trying to paint Armor...
To be clear, to avoid slandering the staff named, you were rude first. Your OP already opened up with a demeaning tone to people who disagreed ("B-b-but Joe?..." etc), and Armor was very much cordial in his first message- to which you replied "Sigh why do I even try being nice to you?" I feel I...
So what you would do is gather scans of relevant feats- explosions and so on- that characters scale to (that is, maybe they survived an explosion, they created it, etc). Give said scans to someone who can calculate them (or try it yourself, we have pages explaining the process, it's not hard to...
I closed the one I sent you, that one is four years old and shouldn't be necro'd. You're better off with the new one rather than pinging all of those users on the old one.
To me, this doesn't even really read like an AP feat. It wouldn't be such on any other verse, and the OP doesn't offer anything substantial to suggest it is. Monica's situation was seemingly because she absorbed CM's energy to do the shit, not the shit itself.
This sort of statement is...
In what way is it the same? Is the event Monica closes literally the same thing, and if so, she didn't close it herself, Strange did, no?
Also: Strange didn't close his, right? He erased everyone's memory of Peter, so the spell ceased on its own. It wasn't even a thing he did, and it seems to...
I just don't really understand why we'd consider this a tier-based ability? Like it does, I suppose, take some amount of strength on Strange's behalf, but isn't this just summoning people from other realities? I don't see anything that strictly mentions affecting Spacetime, and while the visuals...
I think it is UGLY and needs a HAIRCUT and a SHAVE and a BATH maybe with some LOTION to help its SKIN CONDITION and then a MAKEOVER and a SHOPPING SPREE to get NICE CLOTHES.
Without being too on the nose about the "article behind a paywall" thing (this has been adapted to by many sites, but not all), I still maintain that Wikipedia is basically fine to use if nothing else adequately presents itself. I recognize that for scholarly articles one prefers the original...
VSBW is made fun of as the largest community of powerscalers. Random individuals take potshots at it for any number of reasons, anything they could conjure that they disagree with. In a way, VSBW is "The Man", a huge collective that tries to lay down plainly what they think should be so- many...
I don't know the verse and can't really make profiles for it, as a result. Traditionally, you wouldn't request someone else to make a profile- although seeing if others are interested in the verse may bring that about, I suppose. Normally you'd just begin working on it yourself. Reading comics...
Play nice or don't play. This is an informal warning. All y'all been here a long time, you know that your concerns with the thread should be phrased as such: knocking the user is an offense.
To speak on the thread: without further context, the OP's arguments seem dull. If these arguments were...
The only thing that would make this Tier 4 is if you ignore the context and take the words at face value. "Stars". In the void of all context, it is compelling. In the light of context, it is flimsy and weak. It requires us to interpret things as they are in real life rather than how they are...
It does not prove without issue. This is why it is possibly. We have had this discussion in the past- perhaps not you specifically, but they certainly exist. There is countless evidence that the stars they are referring to are not outright traditional stars.
Radahn's "star" only caused a small...
Blogs and images aren't.
I've done some of the work, but it seems they are broadly slow to pursue it. It may be necessary, given the length of time since an agreement was reached. Off the cuff, I think two weeks is ample time.
Again, this is just a property of their specific application of it. You're free to vote how you like, of course, but I don't think this is any more confusing than the current system. I think the presumption is that people are not confused with Immersion as it is now, when I've seen people try to...
I would not agree that this is a case of "contextual bias". It is a case of equivalence, an instance where two things are mechanically very similar and being caught upon the minutiae is not necessary. The minutiae is to be determined for each case regardless, we are here to determine the wide...