This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yeah that's the tough part.
We could get some more participants if some updates can be done through remaking the blogs, as this would, in some cases, be able to be done by all users, and at worst, need at least a content mod to unlock certain profiles.
Still, if we deem such a project...
Experiments would lead to a written assumption. Experiments just let you gain data about common household cameras which may not have easily-available FoV information out there.
In other words, I don't see much difference between "Experiment to find common FoVs, then change our angsizing formula...
I don't think that disproves this thread. Your result found 55 degrees, while we currently use 70 degrees, about as far away from Kulf's suggestion as it is from the status quo.
I didn't actually think of that, but I really should've.
I believe we may be able to think about that sort of thing as dynamically changing the FoV, but that might make only knowing the camera/lens used in a production insufficient, due to the risk of zoom being used.
A variety of thoughts:
I think this change is pretty important, due to its impact on the accuracy of our statistics. I think this is more comparable to adjusting tiers due to recalculating GBE, than it is to changing ways of calculating destruction values (in that there's a concrete, viable...
Maybe something like:
A new range rating has been added, Extradimensional:
If you know a profile where that rating seems fitting, please make a Content Revision Thread to get it added.
Do you think it might be worthwhile keeping this thread open for a few days to a week to answer any questions about the new rating?
If not, I can close this.
I said "some verses have many NSFW elements, that are more extreme than that which a more extreme and morally upsetting than AKM's images".
You responded "actually, we don't allow verses that are literally just ****".
That doesn't actually contradict what I said.
Monogatari spends multiple...
I don't understand.
I don't understand how someone will be disturbed by being on a website where a user has a SFW image which was created by an artist who also draws ****, while also not being disturbed by the website containing many verses with NSFW elements, often of a far more extreme and...
idk what you mean by sponsors and collaboration not happening; as I said, artists that have worked on **** have been hired for large, mainstream productions.
We censor the word due to advertisers believing that the inclusion of words like that makes us an adult website. It's not to protect...
Most artists, for the sake of reaching a wider audience, don't exclusively stick to **** websites; they simultaneously post on a variety of 'em. If someone has safe search on, a search for their name would only take you to the safer websites. If they don't, then they're already looking for...
Quite a few artists with completely innocuous images also draw (and post) 18+ stuff. This happens even within official productions within every medium I can think of.
I think that's really weird considering the verses we allow (which may originally be on platforms where **** is also available, such as book retailers and Steam), and since we allow Twitter WoG.
Like yeah, I get that we shouldn't unnecessarily link to things which are a few steps away from...
I would prefer calling this sort of thing Dimensional Travel regardless (as I do not think we need a separate ability for "dimensional travel but it alludes to fiction"), although I think you are correct in the way you respond to Catzla's claim in the OP.
Although I would give Catzla credit...
I don't understand why you'd add something like that.
"realms that lie outside of a standard multiverse" is proper wording for both tiers like 1-B and High 1-A, as it should, since it doesn't really have anything to do with dimensions. And as you say, there are some niches where...
I'm not very familiar with those types of calcs, but nothing jumps out at me as wrong with it. My only issue would be with consistency (i.e. a few sentences beforehand, despite her anger, Molly's smacks against Lorelai are described as "useless little baby hands weakly bashing against her...
I left comments on each; the former is an invalid way of doing that calculation as the banzai blasters fell off before Indus impacted the wall, meaning they took far less force. The latter is invalid as it involves full-body KE with speeds that ordinary humans survive; people live falling off a...
Putting aside how they're both invalid, if they were valid, I'd say the former wouldn't scale to base dura since they both got injured, while the latter would since she no-sold it.
Oh no I think it's still meaningful, just in a reduced degree.
Sylvie was taken to the hospital due to the minor injuries he'd sustained, and Mera's bones were broken.
To pull some example numbers out of my ass, the idea is that the ability would do something like:
Turn 50 joules into 21...
Yeah that's fair. Molly can't just evaporate the whole thing, and Lorelai never wanted to focus everything into an attack to kill Molly. Does kiiinda bring up the question of why Lorelai can't make a smaller super-durable wall, maybe she can't, or maybe she just lacks the imagination for it...
Not seeing plot manip at all tbqh.
The Graham stuff is just weird, because I think it's either that Molly's power directly counters Lorelai's in some way (Molly dumbs things down, Lorelai augments them to make them louder), or because Lorelai's "dream bubbles" are less real than other summons...
There's a reason why I generally don't hold that to be the case, but do for EE. It's not just that Giovanni's "treated as an athlete" canonically, it's that that's the reference for his strength from outside of the text. And because he has anti-feats, like being hurt when kicking a vase. And the...
Actually, since something needs to be done about the TTRPG mechanics stuff, I should elaborate on that.
I've considered a few ways to deal with that, and I think I've narrowly picked out a winner:
Characters Are Super Durable: There's the obvious contradictions with Mera here. And some added...
No, the acknowledgement of JRPG-style mechanics isn't PIS, it's an integral part of the verse.
On top of that statement you mention, there's also this statement from one of the livestreams:
And this statement from Jello's tumblr:
I'm not exactly sure how this should be indexed, but I struggle...
Currently focusing on finding replacements for Wonder Woman. If no-one's helped with those Superman feats by the time I'm done, I can try to find and calc 'em.
Hey gamers, an off-site acquaintance of mine pointed out an issue with Golden Age Wonder Woman's attack potency, striking strength, and lifting strength. Looking into it myself, it does seem concerning.
Essentially, the scan for it is a preview page from the comic, an interstition between two...
I think whether it would cause any adverse effects to a teenager is far, far more important than what the artist intended.
Like, your justification for removing it is the effect such images would have. So the intent shouldn't matter, only the likely effect would be.
I disagree with this bolded...
lol
(To be clear, this is not accusing you of being a nazi; it's pointing out the pitfalls of declaring things as vague as "degeneracy" to be objectively bad, and seeking their removal. Throughout history, such rhetoric has consistently been used to go after outcasts and minorities. You're not...
I don't think being aware of it is an issue, which is why the vast majority of parents and governments in the western world have no issue with it.
Notice how I didn't say "THIS RULE WOULD BAN SHOWING MARRIED COUPLES IN THE SAME BED". I previously said:
And in that message I said
Then...