This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
And that's understandable, I simply disagree because is not clear enough. And anything we try apply to this scene suffers from the same kind of speculation. In the worst case scenario, I'd list it under his transmutation/reality warp and BFR that he can deconstruct a target and incapacitate...
Ah, you are right. I had read the OP wrong.
Then this entire thread is completely pointless. We had already concluded the neutral space has some form of time*. It's just not significant enough to be 5-D.
*I will try to find the thread where this was concluded
The argument is that he's accessing the higher time dimension, since normally there isn't time in the world of void, giving a 5-D origin to his ability.
If not, then the world of void has its own time axis separate from the rest of the universes.
Me personally? I think they are trying to get...
If you are talking about the feat in the OP, it's quite simply an incredibly vague feat that could be interpreted in a myriad of ways. As such, I don't find it enough to claim it was a form of regeneration without anything else.
If there are other feats instead, bring em up, bucko
The problem with "proposal 3", you are essentially asking for an overhaul of the verse. This can't be managed easily on a single thread, requires a lot of discussion, and quite simply, you haven't given supporters time to organize. Moreover, you want in this single revision, with barely any...
Problem being, DB is extremely controversial (you can see from just the votes here), this topic in particular is a controversial topic (dealing with tier 1), so it necessitates 3 staff votes.
Though not my fastest thread closure, there was another where the thread was up for like 3 min
Guy was confused, had to direct him to the discussion threads for the verse
So, for the future:
– Read all rules here
Now then, with this said, I will close this now. I recommend you seriously make an effort to get acquainted with our standards. You can ask around other Bleach supporters (which you seem to have interacted already with them on the discussion thread...
The argument for Yan Sen's resistance is that Henry says he's above the plot. He's clearly not, because he can't ignore the plot fully.
Plus, kinda not comparable situations imo. As said, I only agree with limited. If other staff disagree with me, that's fine.
The plot says Henry is infinitely strong, but with that he can't beat Yan Sen. He resists that.
The plot says he can't kill Henry, and Yan Sen confirms this. So he's not resisting that.
Thus, he's not fully resistant to the plot.
That's really it.
Yan Sen isn't capable of killing him because the plot is making him constantly stronger, but not enough to beat Yan Sen. That's why is limited, Yan Sen is resisting part of it, but not enough to completely ignore the ability. He even had to summon another Henry to fully get past him.
While I can understand the skepticism and agree to an extent it's weird, I think I value more the fact they included the specific animation at all. On a visual medium, unless given reason to suspect the portrayal, I'd say to take everything shown into consideration. So in that sense, the...