This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I haven't seen any evidence that the Nightmare Realm contains other dimensions. Only that it is between other dimensions and acts as a gateway.
This confirms what I'm saying:
Being called a "higher plane" is irrelevant. If you can prove that the plane has Qualitiative Superiority, that's fine...
You hurt your own argument with the fluff. Two out of the four additional pieces of info are the same (that it's infinite in size) and have nothing to do with being higher dimensional. The higher plane statement isn't helpful.
So really we have one more piece of info which is an illustration of...
Given that he's talking about college courses he took, I am not sure it's even a given that the dimensions necessarily refer to the nightmare realm rather than something in their native dimension. If he studied this in college for three semesters and could've taken more classes, and if the...
I'm not sure what you mean. What kind of elaboration could be provided beyond what I've said, with regard to a scan that says very little? My stance is pretty straightforward. The argument in favor of the upgrade is that the reference to Fifth Dimensional Calculus can be inferred to mean that...
I'm not opposed to the idea that it's geometric, but the context is really fuzzy. I don't think it necessarily implies the NR itself is 5-D or tells us enough about the nature of the dimensions such that we could scale it to someone in the series necessarily.
I don't love the way the information is presented.
Being called a "higher plane" isn't helpful, and I am not as persuaded about the optical illusions being evidence of higher spatial dimensions. The "Fifth-Dimensional Calculus" reference with regard to building the portal device seems better...
The "existing in 7 to 11 dimensions at once" appears to more naturally refer to universes IMO. Especially as he is describing what creatures have that skeleton shape, which would appear to be a relatively normal skeleton. In absence of further context I don't think it's strong enough evidence to...
This is a good point, and similarly the one piece of info that I do have about the verse is that its a Tier™ verse and it does make more sense to wait for that to become clearer before any CRTs are made.
So, I don't personally have any knowledge of this verse at all, with regard to the media itself or what it was like here on the wiki/forum. Further, I am not familiar with what sort of criteria we employ with regard to deleting or reinstating verses. I will remain neutral for now until there is...
I understand that issue, but despite the similar description the book is expressing that "easily smashing them to pieces with extra power" is why the hammer kills them. The fact that the swords "break them into pieces" must be considered distinct from this despite being similar.
I don't...
The novel describes Kratos as needing to grind them into dust to prevent them from reforming. I am aware this is secondary canon, but I am using this to make a comparison. The finishers/hammer serve a similar purpose, the guide describes this as "finishing them off" and that the hammer has...
Its certainly possible, but I think it is far fetched. It's difficult to imagine a coherent mechanism through which the negation would only occur alongside a damage threshold being met, rather than it merely being a matter of damage threshold. When I asked for one in the thread and in other...
It can be discussed privately if needed, but I trust your judgment. If Topaz truly is a sock then naturally the appeal is invalid and the new account ought to he banned as well.
The point is that if they disassemble after being hit several times with the hammer and then re-assemble, their ability to re-assemble isn't being negated by the hammer.
I would prefer to nip this in the bud. Please do not continue to argue here on the matter between yourselves. The recent threads will be looked into to determine if it constitutes a rule violation.
From Part 1:
This was May 15th, which means we have to get this done within six days while the spark is alive. Should be doable.
No objections to updating based on the renewed calc.
As an aside, where does the 41x come from? Him saying "plus" instead of "times" or some equivalent would make...
@Adam1936
Adam, these sorts of remarks alongside others you made in the thread are frowned upon. I don't believe they reach a threshold for serious action, but disagreements are to be expected on a debating website, and this is not an appropriate response. Refrain from this in the future, please.
After reading through this and some of the matters referenced by DDM and Clover, I am inclined to think this individual should not be allowed back.
If the most recent debacle was the sole matter at hand, I'd say it's fine to give another chance. However, a long series of bans tracing back all...
The hammer faces the same obstacle. You can hit them with the hammer, cause them to scatter into bones, and they will still reform.
The hammer doesn't deactivate their ability to reform from scattered bones..
Yeah. I'm in the same boat. Even aside from the general annoyance factor, those sorts of arguments just prevent any meaningful voting because no one wants to sift through the mostly aimless arguing. So I try my best to focus on the most important details
@Mr. Bambu @Firestorm808 @CrimsonStarFallen @DarkGrath
Any of you mind looking over this? If it helps, the verse supporters are also in agreement with these changes, so it's uncontroversial this time:
This is not substantively different from this scan which you did use on the thread:
The only thing it mentions further is the Barbarian hammer having "extra power" to smash them into pieces, which again speaks to the damage threshold point that was discussed.
The notion of banning someone for 3-6 months over a report such as this is far far removed from how we've approached these matters in the past, and the invocation of past reports which were themselves unactionable lends a great deal of credibility to the sentiment expressed above: these...
I think Fuji's own assessment is worth revsiting here:
Personally, I am of the same opinion, and I think notions of "report after report/warning after warning" reflect that this approach is a success. The pot shot you're referring to Ant is that she said she was "not fond of" people who leave...
He says "re-examine the palettes in all other areas" which means he is not referring to previous games. However, I'd prefer not to go back and forth about this. This is not great evidence regardless. The novelization even says the following:
This scan says the opposite of what you're saying.
"We didn't want to make Hades all blood red and fiery everywhere, so we needed to re-examine the color palettes."
This is not really useful information in any case. The chain of reasoning is way too specious. Styx might have fire in it...
If all you are saying is that you would prefer Fuji handle things differently but recognize that she's under no obligation of the sort, then I'd say it's best not expressed in RVR at all.
We just have an issue with tribalism across a lot of verses. People who are fans of certain verses are seen as "supporters" and there is an expectation that they want upgrades and do not want downgrades. A downgrade thread is perceived by the group as a personal threat/attack, and even in the...
I'm not merely saying it's "off-topic." I am saying it isn't RVR related. Unless you're taking the stance that the manner in which she has organized these threads is a rule violation, it isn't prudent to discuss it here. If you are of the stance that something she said in the aforementioned...
I didn't. I have no knowledge to suggest KLOL's retirement was related to Fuji and I did not imply that. My response to Clover was addressing the notion being proposed by him and Propellus which I felt wasn't reasonable, I did not suggest that they were accurately describing KLOL's feelings or...