This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I don't know of such a feat, but one could theoretically be pursued in the exact same manner as our calc for vaporizing a human, and then upscaled/downscaled as needed to account for the size of the demon. I would agree a lion looks more apt from the image provided.
By saying this, I mean that...
This one also has four pages already, eh.
My last position was generally agreeing with Minaa, but then the arguments continued on for a great deal of time. It was remade and that seems to have continued.
If someone could offer me a conclusion of the arguments of both sides on each point in...
I would say I have a basic understanding, although if this is something really nitty gritty I would basically always recommend going to someone better than I.
We would have wanted to use his iconic look, which would be the simpler image from the actual Madness Combat animations. That said, it was voted on and people went for Red vs Blue instead.
There's sufficient agreement that the general rudeness is in violation of our rules, if only barely, and so I've added a formal warning to the tracker. If people feel so inclined, they ought to discuss the matter of the legitimacy of his argument in the given thread.
The purpose of this thread isn't to address the scaling of the given verse, whether he was right or wrong on that point doesn't change whether he did or did not break our rules. We have rules on rudeness in dealing with others, I think he went over the lines drawn by them but not far over them...
He did tag you.
He is being overly rude, and I don't support that sort of mindset seeping in from more unruly places, although the case still seems minor. I'd accept a warning, although even that is on the heavier end. Shall wait for what others think.
Main feat of the OP was previously rejected due to the vagueness of it, and there's something to be said about the fact that we don't see what the walker is doing, just that it's leveraging the head against an angle (meaning breaking the neck there isn't just the Walker's doing).
I plan on...
For something that requires more creative interpretation, you're better off going to Ultima. Even still, it should be known that being fifth dimensional alone would require then proving transcendent levels of power to actually be Low 1-C.
Oh, you're right, I'd forgotten these threads had a lower grace period. I just woke up, don't mind me.
Feel free to apply it, I can close it for you if you like?
So it goes like this.
One staff is needed for self-evident threads. Giving flight to a guy with wings or weapon mastery to a chick with a sword and the capability to use it: no interpretation needed, these are self-evidently true.
Two staff is standard.
Three staff is the requirement for...
I'd like it known I previously rejected the most notable element of this here.
The fact of the matter is that The Walking Dead has been constantly peppered with upgrade threads and that the verse presents a staggering amount of anti-feats and caveats to those feats that do exist- neck snaps...
It is not my intent or the intent of others to legitimately worsen the quality of life for anyone on this forum. You just need to understand what it is you're doing when you insist on someone getting a report for something so minor- even if, in your context, it had a bigger impact.
This was...
I've recently made the decision to try to avoid CRTs that don't lay out what they're changing and by what logic they are making the change, as they aren't very conducive to being evaluated (since like. I have to manually pursue any explanation.)
If it were just a redesign, I'd chip in, but I...
That said, watching the video... it seems to imply this is very much an ongoing thing, and not an attack or whatever, yeah? Even then, the "galaxy on fire" portrayal may be a contrivance of the cartoon and not literal.
When I was 8 years old I watched my father drunkenly take a hand to my stepmother and while the police were on their way to take him away, he sat down and tried to explain to me "why".
When I was 10, I was in the hospital room with my grandpa as he succumbed to cancer. It didn't impact me...
SlendVeny didn't continue to "keep targeting" him after posting that, or at least not publicly. Neither did anybody in that thread do anything against him. Misdeeds are being invented to suit the report, I suspect.
@AppleLord, you have over 11,000 posts on this forum and in all likelihood an...
What it actually says is this.
Those crates are not holding 22,600,000 kilograms of explosives.
No.
As for your request for an estimate. Unlikely? The thickness of the crates is unknown and the type of fireworks would make a huge difference, as would packing insulation (of which there is...
I think it's a dicey ass change and requires some baseline assumptions, and I don't know which characters scale to which, but yeah. If you know something to counter it, I'm happy to hear it, this one is... tenuous.
Now this... this is something bite-sized I can tackle in just a few minutes. My psyche appreciates it.
I agree with the removal of Power Absorption, no real contention there he just straight up doesn't resist it.
Similarly agree with Poison and Acid- although if the poison is meant to be...
The second CRT was made such that the universally agreed upon content of the prior one could be applied without confusion from incoming staff. This is not "taking another attempt at immediately previously rejected things" and I think it's absurdly bad faith to paint it as such.
Regarding the...
I wasn't aware his changes interfaced with that, fair enough. I rescind my agreement.
Even if its not, seems silly to accept it now and just change it back later via technicality.
I don't mind allowing this to pass and only voicing opinions on later things. Frees up some percentage of the workload, at least. I didn't anticipate this to get the staff attention it did, so I'm not as concerned as I would be otherwise.
it's nice to know we'll abandon the ideology of super...