This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
@DarkDragonMedeus @Everything12 @Elizhaa @Dereck03 @Qawsedf234 @DarkGrath @Planck69 @LordTracer @Shiroiyo @Enryu_The_Red_Tower @Vietthai96 A little help pls.
You'd rather given a misleading context that the staff accepted Architect's and Shadow's R>F transcendence which isn't the case. Suppose that's where his comment "so maybe you can upgrade to Low 1-C first, and wait until later with anything further?" came from.
It's fine. I already asked Ant to...
I don't think that counts as an agreement since he didn't say he did. @Antvasima can you clarify your stance?
However, even if he did, a single approval wouldn't be enough.
He was rather talking about the changes with the R>F system itself, not specifically for this revision.
And Bambu...
If this isn't a disagreement then I don't know what is.
Some details get overlooked at certain intervals and Ant questioned all the edits that were made onto the pages. Anyway, I have already given my word; applying unaccepted revisions goes against our guidelines and is considered vandalism...
This is nowhere near an accepted revision. Ant disagreed with this CRT and DDM hasn't directly given input towards this thread. Also, tier 1 changes are rather considered controversial and multiple staff approvals will be required. Please don't apply unapproved revisions ever again.
I saw the name on the URL. Anyways, I read through the article and its 100 percent created by a powerscaler. That page has a lot of powerscaling terminologies directly translated into Chinese using MTL.
Was a block necessary? They added quite some details to the article and provided an entire editing reason in a genuine matter, which doesn't make them look like a troll. They've only changed the statistics of an article once with no precedent warnings; a month block towards a new clueless member...
I was suggested to create a calc discussion thread regarding this issue, as suggested by Flashlight237.
Here's a calculation I made:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:GarrixianXD/Calculation_to_vaporise_an_opponent_in_one_attack
The original one-shot gap is 7.5x, however, that...
The FCOC and JBW staff agreed to not migrate SCP to any of those wikis; any discussion about what to do about the franchise post-deletion is nothing worth concern and is irrelevant to the current topic.