• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Search results for query: *

  1. Theglassman12

    "Let's Talk About Magic"-Part 2: Magic P&A/Potency Revision & Explanation Page

    Does the abilities that aren't spelled out for us being High 1-B to Low 1-A just 4-D by default or what?
  2. Theglassman12

    Final Fantasy Tactics: Ye Olde Statistics Update (and a few Resistances)

    @TartaChocholate you’re thinking of XXKING’s thread where he kept pushing that for his main and sock account, it’s already been refuted so yeah.
  3. Theglassman12

    That doesn’t really sound like enhanced regen since that doesn’t make any sense without it going...

    That doesn’t really sound like enhanced regen since that doesn’t make any sense without it going the higher tier of regen. If there’s still information left then that just means all the information is still there, so they wouldn’t have high godly since they still have that remaining and it...
  4. Theglassman12

    Final Fantasy Tactics: Ye Olde Statistics Update (and a few Resistances)

    not sure on fate hax for the doom spell unless there's more to it to elaborate on it controlling fate itself. The Malboro should have disease manipulation with the bacteria. Your doom fist scan is too small, can barely read it. The ghost stuff should have necromancy with the whole zombie status...
  5. Theglassman12

    Hax Layer Evaluation Thread

    @Tony_di_bugalu Now that I got some free time to evaluate, I'll give your blog a looksie. You've provided more than enough evidence that with an increase in demonic energy, characters are able to fight off demonic powers easily when prior they couldn't. I still disagree with the infinite and...
  6. Theglassman12

    Hax Layer Evaluation Thread

    You need evidence, the new standard requires such to be the case, so just having a scaling chain won’t cut it.
  7. Theglassman12

    Hax Layer Evaluation Thread

    @Dog3352 you either need actual showcase of resistances being overpowered or have something similar to china verses where there's some layers of a power system that verbatim states the higher levels can overcome resistances of lower levels regardless of what ability it is.
  8. Theglassman12

    No since it’s not damaged, let alone erased whatsoever. It would only be nonexistent if it was...

    No since it’s not damaged, let alone erased whatsoever. It would only be nonexistent if it was already erased in the first place.
  9. Theglassman12

    Nier Tweaks

    Looks good to me
  10. Theglassman12

    Hax Layer Evaluation Thread

    @RanaProGamer any verse that has layered hax from prior to the standard revisions needs to have them evaluated here to see if they qualify, though any new verses with them can be evaluated here.
  11. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Antvasima Me and Pepsiman responded to his points, we’re waiting for him to respond at this point.
  12. Theglassman12

    Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

    I agree with a warning
  13. Theglassman12

    I’ll take it up with you in discord if that’s fine with you.

    I’ll take it up with you in discord if that’s fine with you.
  14. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    The first one KLOL was asking Wokistan and Firestorm for comments on the newer scans and only one of them remotely responded. Second one Pepsiman was still arguing but he got shut down despite the notable vote difference, which is hardly any different than this thread with a 3 vote difference...
  15. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Mr. Bambu So why did the prior two threads close right on the dime for grace period when there was still a discussion happening? Again this seems very biased that a thread with people still arguing just gets shut down before they get any answer, let alone have the discussion come to a close but...
  16. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    You’re the one claiming such a rule exists that rejected threads can still continue after grace period and the votes being in favor of it being rejected. I’m asking where is that ever stated, especially in comparisons to threads getting accepted?
  17. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Deagonx no give me the link to the wiki rules that says this right now, where does it say that rejected threads can still continue even after a major vote difference?
  18. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Ultima_Reality I’m confused on what you mean by it being interpreted as the soul and body for the primordials and Gaia, especially when the novel talks about how Everything that’s related to the earth itself is Gaia, that plus the fact Gaia is aware of Kratos across time itself to where she’s...
  19. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Deagonx so like how the last 2 threads were still ongoing yet you closed both of them before we reached a conclusion on both sides? Sounds more like you just want the thread to drag on longer than it needs to despite the vote difference.
  20. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Antvasima Planck has agreed that he'd be willing to rework the conceptual arguments to have some more direct statements on the nature and at least provide evidence of such a thing happening, though it will take him some time since it's the end of the semester for most folks so I assume it will...
  21. Theglassman12

    The Death of SCP

    You do realize the examples that Bambu have brought up would by default make SCP as a whole be at risk of being banned from the website with your own standard right? Especially with how the tiering system is being used and versus battle words like nonexistent physiology, something rarely if ever...
  22. Theglassman12

    Arc System Works Discussion Thread 2

    LET'S ******* GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  23. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Deagonx You wanna quote the wiki rules that says the same can't be applied to rejected threads when there's a clear vote difference? I'd like to see that please. @Mr. Bambu No the votes were near neck in neck with the bio stuff with both Pepsiman and KLOL still arguing and asking questions yet...
  24. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Mr. Bambu DarkGrath has the right to reopen the thread to make a comment, plus her question is about understanding Deagon's definition of what a concept is, not the legitimacy of GoW having concept hax since she disagrees with the thread. Also last time I checked Deagon closed the two prior...
  25. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    Welp, grace period is over and the final vote tally is 6-3, thread's been rejected so this can be closed.
  26. Theglassman12

    The Death of SCP

    Yeah for a while, especially since over a dozens of tier 0 characters just showed up left and right for the verse I was kinda skeptical on if the writers are aware of the tiering system here since it's too much of a coincidence, though with these evidence yeah it's very clear that they know...
  27. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Elizhaa @Maverick_Zero_X @LordGriffin1000 @Emirp sumitpo @DemonGodMitchAubin any input here would be appreciated. Here’s Planck’s response to the OP which gives more insight to CM1 GoW.
  28. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    The force that’s the beginning of what shapes reality like chaos, also nice apples and oranges comparison here. I’m talking about the soul and nature stuff, explain why that’s not concept hax beyond just “it’s not concept hax” because just saying no is not an answer. Not an argument, explain...
  29. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Deagonx so them being similar forces of nature that’s responsible for the creation of their realities is apparently not evidence, riiiiiight….. Explain why, you keep saying they’re not concepts and you don’t explain why, so why the hell should I take your point seriously? Ah yes, none of the...
  30. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    Ok? And how does this debunk him arguing they're still treated as one and the same? Literally when has this been typical when at no point does souls in general function like this? Especially when it fundamentally changes a being from one to a completely different person? Especially when the...
  31. Theglassman12

    Immortality type 9 for Raiden Ei/Raiden Shogun

    looks fine to me
  32. Theglassman12

    they sure are

    they sure are
  33. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    Planck bringing up the point that the primordial forces are the same across realms means they're one and the same regardless of the pantheon we talk about. If you don't know why soul's form is argued to be conceptual when Garm's mere nature itself is being changed by Fenrir's form of the soul to...
  34. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Deagonx You seem to be hell bent on bringing up Gaia as the only argument with being formless when other examples exist, plus the fact they have a more non-physical state as well as being a part of the beginning of everything with Ascension's intro and just the Spark of the world in general...
  35. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    @Deagonx And it's not a challenging task to put 2 and 2 together on why they disagree in the first place when someone's made a refute prior to their votes. Can you quote where Planck said that Gaia's the only argument for conceptual? Because Gaia's not the only being who's formless in their...
  36. Theglassman12

    Removal of Immortality Negation

    Either the users bit or just the whole "dimensional level stuff" we can trim down to make it more concise.
  37. Theglassman12

    Removal of Immortality Negation

    So that's 4 for trimming/moving the ability somewhere else (Me, Planck, DDM, and Propellus), and 3 for deletion (Crab, Bambu and Armor)
  38. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    That doesn’t explain shit when someone making an entire refute and then others following up with “I disagree with the thread” is enough, the fact you need the opposition to go through this many hoops despite it being very clear as day on why they’d disagree is plain stupid. You made a comment...
  39. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    Why do they have to explain their disagreement when the opposition already summarized their points in the first place? By this logic none of the folks in the prior threads you're a part of remotely counts for votes when all they did is just say "I agree" and they don't elaborate on their points...
  40. Theglassman12

    Removal of God of War's "Type 1 Concept Manipulation"

    I literally said I disagree with the thread, I don't see how that's somehow not clear enough. You keep saying that none of these things remotely explain concepts and magic but I find it hard to take your point seriously when you haven't refuted every single point Planck has made and only...
Back
Top