Sure. We can continue the discussion here.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
VS Battles Wiki Forum
Deagonx
Pepsimanslover
Great,
"The point is that if they disassemble after being hit several times with the hammer and then re-assemble, their ability to re-assemble isn't being negated by the hammer."
While I can see your point, I think it can be simply argued that the hammer only nullified it when it disassembled the Remains itself, with the only reason that the Cursed Remain being able to survive it was because it disassembled itself to avoid anymore hits from the hammer.
"The point is that if they disassemble after being hit several times with the hammer and then re-assemble, their ability to re-assemble isn't being negated by the hammer."
While I can see your point, I think it can be simply argued that the hammer only nullified it when it disassembled the Remains itself, with the only reason that the Cursed Remain being able to survive it was because it disassembled itself to avoid anymore hits from the hammer.
Deagonx
Its certainly possible, but I think it is far fetched. It's difficult to imagine a coherent mechanism through which the negation would only occur alongside a damage threshold being met, rather than it merely being a matter of damage threshold. When I asked for one in the thread and in other places the responses were avoidant.
Moreover the description of the weapon seems to suggest its about physical damage. We have guides but they conspicuously neglect to mention that Kratos' finishers or hammer have some negation ability but it's meant to be inferred from this sort of awkward unclear mechanism. As far as I'm concerned that's not a good justification.
Moreover the description of the weapon seems to suggest its about physical damage. We have guides but they conspicuously neglect to mention that Kratos' finishers or hammer have some negation ability but it's meant to be inferred from this sort of awkward unclear mechanism. As far as I'm concerned that's not a good justification.
Pepsimanslover
The problem with it being a damage threshold alone, Atleast in my view, is the need of a specific weapon or move to kill them.
If it was simply a damage threshold, then why couldn't Kratos attack them continuously with the Blades until they die? Why use a specific move or weapon?
If it was simply a damage threshold, then why couldn't Kratos attack them continuously with the Blades until they die? Why use a specific move or weapon?