The proof is that the data records are only one (for example, there is only one data record about the branching route about choosing Vegeta as the instructor, even though any previous route could branch to it)
They are not story/timeline branches merging after branching or overlapping because DBX follows MWI (many worlds interpretation) as we know it and these are not timelines but their Data Records. Also multiple branches about the same event cannot exist at the same time because they have been deleted and reset by Fu (but not the Data about it).
That is, they are abstract and universal (which are the only things in common of all physical timelines branching off of it without merging/overlapping branched routes or timelines) in accordance with vbw standards.
Is this enough in your opinion?
They are not story/timeline branches merging after branching or overlapping because DBX follows MWI (many worlds interpretation) as we know it and these are not timelines but their Data Records. Also multiple branches about the same event cannot exist at the same time because they have been deleted and reset by Fu (but not the Data about it).
That is, they are abstract and universal (which are the only things in common of all physical timelines branching off of it without merging/overlapping branched routes or timelines) in accordance with vbw standards.
Is this enough in your opinion?
2. Conceptual Manip is a stretching, while it is not entirely NLF wank, VSBW strict standard will not accept unless some good solid evidences about manipulating concept are shown, at best it is reality warping which already on many DBH/DBXV profiles. About Data and Information Manip, it is a possibility though