https://vsbattles.com/threads/rule-violation-reports-new-forum.107529/post-5919234
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
VS Battles Wiki Forum
Deagonx
RandomGuy2345
I really don't see what Monke did wrong. He was just helping contribute to the report, something Dread has done multiple times with little push back, other than the rare occasion where she does get called out for it.
You're getting way too trigger happy. You could've warned Monke, or at the very least tell him why he got banned if you were going to ban him.
You're getting way too trigger happy. You could've warned Monke, or at the very least tell him why he got banned if you were going to ban him.
Deagonx
His permanent thread ban was only lifted so that he could defend himself against an earlier accusation. I was simply restoring it as I forgot to once the matter was concluded.
RandomGuy2345
Fair enough ig, but I still don't see the point of deleting his comment when all he was doing was helping contribute.
Deagonx
At that point it was already clear that no action was going to be taken, and the connection this situation had to what he was bringing up was pretty specious. We don't need to pretend it was motivated by anything other than a desire to dunk on Dread.
RandomGuy2345
You do realize I can make a hasty assumption like you just did when Dread kept on pestering staff in the RVR thread to ban Monke for jokingly telling one of his friends to kys (once again, it was joke), despite the issue being resolved a while ago?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dread brought the issue up again, and was proposing that Monke should be banned for 3 months. By your logic, I can make an assumption that Dread was trying to dunk on Monke.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dread brought the issue up again, and was proposing that Monke should be banned for 3 months. By your logic, I can make an assumption that Dread was trying to dunk on Monke.
Deagonx
Why would I be concerned about what assumptions you make?
RandomGuy2345
You don't have to. I couldn't care less.
My point was that I (as well as Monke) could've used the same logic you just used when Dread brought up something Monke did a while ago that was already resolved. Me or Monke could've said that Dread did that to just dunk on Monke.
Did you see a problem in what Dread did when she brought up what Monke did?
I couldn't care less if you aren't concerned about the assumptions I make. The world doesn't revolve around you.
My point was that I (as well as Monke) could've used the same logic you just used when Dread brought up something Monke did a while ago that was already resolved. Me or Monke could've said that Dread did that to just dunk on Monke.
Did you see a problem in what Dread did when she brought up what Monke did?
I couldn't care less if you aren't concerned about the assumptions I make. The world doesn't revolve around you.
DaMonkeMan
Thanks for defending me, but I don't think you should go back and forth with him over this, honestly.
Deagon, I don't even know what to say man. I shouldn't be admitting this, especially not out loud, but I always thought you were too immature and belligerent to be staff, yet this is still a really baffling decision from you.
What makes you think you can decide whether or not I have a right to add evidence to a report in the thread where everybody has permission to make reports?
Even if you thought it was out of spite for what she did to me earlier (y'know, if we just ignore the fact that it really wasn't, she just broke the rules multiple times and I wanted to inform them that she did), it still brought relevant and useful information to the table and showed that she had a history of being ignorant to staff instructions, even when multiple staff members warned her to listen.
I understand that you both may not like me, but making decisions based off whether or not you like a user is incredibly far from what you're supposed to do and be as a staff member, you really should know that much.
At the very least you could have kept my comment up, but what ever, I suppose we can just forget that happened.
Deagon, I don't even know what to say man. I shouldn't be admitting this, especially not out loud, but I always thought you were too immature and belligerent to be staff, yet this is still a really baffling decision from you.
What makes you think you can decide whether or not I have a right to add evidence to a report in the thread where everybody has permission to make reports?
Even if you thought it was out of spite for what she did to me earlier (y'know, if we just ignore the fact that it really wasn't, she just broke the rules multiple times and I wanted to inform them that she did), it still brought relevant and useful information to the table and showed that she had a history of being ignorant to staff instructions, even when multiple staff members warned her to listen.
I understand that you both may not like me, but making decisions based off whether or not you like a user is incredibly far from what you're supposed to do and be as a staff member, you really should know that much.
At the very least you could have kept my comment up, but what ever, I suppose we can just forget that happened.