VS Battles Wiki Forum

When you measured the height of the layers, the measurements didn't overlayed each other right?

I saw that you calculated the cavity and then substrated it from the layer, which is good, but the cavity is not even 10% of the layer, how is that possible?

Yes, each layer is measured separately and they do not overlap.

And we have 10% of the cavity only in the largest layers. In some layers, the cavity reaches 40-50% if you look separately.

I calculated and the average cavity was 26%, which is approximately what we expected.

If everything is fine, could you leave a comment under the blog?

By the way, I have a calculation of the burning of the CRSC surface by Boros and in fact the result is very much in agreement with what Orochi performed. Can you watch this?

It seems the reason why it wasn't accepted is because incineration didn't necessarily mean vaporization or even melting.

I left an evaluation on the Orochi calc.

Thank you

Boros is supposed to scale to Orochi. Should we then remove the calculation from CRSC if it gives us one result, but the profile will have another?

Boros would scale above Orochi, yes.

I have noticed one of the comments regarding the gravity acceleration in the outer core and they are most likely right, it's 4.3 m/s^2 in the outer-inner boundary, but it gets faster the higher you are, up to 10.8 m/s^2 in the mantle-outer core boundary.

10.8+4.3= 15.1/2 = 7.55 m/s^2

g = 7.55 m/sec^2;

PE = 1.1919728 x 10^22 * 2868000 * 7.55

PE = 2.58 x 10^29 Joules = 61.66 Exatons of TNT = 5-C

And that should be the the true result, sorry for the inconvenience.

Oh no need to apologize. You've been very helpful, thank you.
I'll make adjustments later.

I still have a question regarding ENO dimensions. Is your version in use?

If the world map from this calculation is relevant, then it turns out that the planet OPM is at least 10 times larger than ours.

Calculating the size of a fictional planet without proof that it's actually larger than Earth is not even allowed, a planet 10 times larger than Earth would have 1000 times the mass, meaning 1000 times the gravity, such a planet is impossible and even more impossible would be life on it.

That's the reason why the One Piece world is only accepted to be as large as Earth.

So my suggestion would be not to use EOW to calculate the size of other objects, since just like Sage Centipede, there is a huge disparity in size between each of EOW's panel.

You could probably get a Garou dozens of meters tall if you compared his size with Sage Centipede. Another reason not to use EOW's size to calculate anything.

Does this apply to an artist's mistake?

It seems like in Toriko the planet is several dozen times larger than ours and it quite exists.


At least the eye does not really fit with the panels with aircraft carriers and where we see clouds.

If at least 3 panels indicate the dimensions of the SC, then only 1 panel indicates this ENO.

EOW's eye is far behind the aircraft carrier, and it still appears much bigger than the ship compared to the previous chapter.

Now I'm thinking - in the PE formula, should we use the height of all layers at once (as it has already been done) or only the height to which it was raised? In your and my version, the first option was used.

I updated the calculation and added a section with KE just so that it could be evaluated. The results are actually very large, but many users wanted to see what this method will give.

Ugarik and I changed the method of calculating the High 6-B feat. I used this frame, where there are also at least 18 turns (if you don't count each feature as a rotation, which I don't think was the author's idea). Given that there is an afterimage of Sage on the 2nd frame, even though it is already rotating, I believe we can stick to the end in 1 second.

If Ugarik is fine with it then I have no issues with using a 1 second end.

Actually I wanted to ask you what you think about the number of rotations on the second frame of the scan that I sent you. We have 2 visual techniques at once - a spiral and circles. I see at least 4 rotations in a spiral, but most likely this means forward movement, and not just rotation.
The 18 rotations I counted are larger and smaller circles whose lines extend beyond the body of the Sage.
However, maybe in your opinion there are much more or less rotations?

This runs under the assumption that these wind circles are intended to represent each of SG spins, but I'm fine with it.

In this panel I counted about 18 to 20 wind circles around SG's body.

The ones in your panel are much clearer though, so 18 spins per second should be fine to use.