Lilybitdun
She/Her- 2,400
- 1,411
I'm writing this while very sleep deprived so apologizes in advance if something is messed up in OP or the recalcs
Problems:
Problems:
The more important one is the second feat as it serves the basis for Subaru's 9-B+ rating
Agree (2): ElJoaki5 (Agrees on second calc replacement with just V.Frag, waiting to comment on the first. Comment. Agrees with both, Comment), Damage3245 (Comment)
Disagree:
Neutral:
If I had a nickel every time I did a 9-B+ downgrade thread I would have 2 nickels
Problems:
- The calc assumes 1 inch depth, which is very arbitrary since we use 1cm for minimum while an inch is 2.54cm
- The depth assumption is unnecessary as you can use Kan's head to find the crater depth
- The calc uses Subaru's Head as point of reference, there are two problems with this: The line ends at a random point on his head and generally larger points of reference are more accurate for pixel scaling which is possible
- The pixel scaling includes the cracking around the crater as part of the hole, which is inaccurate for how crater volumes are calculated
Problems:
- The calc uses Pulverization although small fragments are shown on impact
- Assuming chest depth despite us being able to see the crater depth due to it being a side view
The more important one is the second feat as it serves the basis for Subaru's 9-B+ rating
Agree (2): ElJoaki5 (Agrees on second calc replacement with just V.Frag, waiting to comment on the first. Comment. Agrees with both, Comment), Damage3245 (Comment)
Disagree:
Neutral:
Last edited:
