• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Recent content by Ugarik

  1. Ugarik

    Genshin Impact Discussion Thread

    100% Rerir should have portal creation since he can open moon gate
  2. Ugarik

    Bending Feats

    It's negligible compared to total work so calculating it is generaly not secessary. But the formulas you brought are correct nontheless
  3. Ugarik

    Genshin Impact Discussion Thread

    I think we need a different thread for Xiuhcoatl profile. There are too many problems with it
  4. Ugarik

    Genshin Impact Discussion Thread

    Moreover, his Elemental intangibility doesn't affect that eye which was the only way he could be harmed in that state
  5. Ugarik

    Genshin Impact Discussion Thread

    There are many mistakes in this profile. 1) Xbalanque wasn't an archon when he fought him 2) You forgot Elemental intangibility (could plunge his entire body into primal fire) 3) You forgot whole bunch weakesses in his corupted version like how he was only conscious in short periods of his...
  6. Ugarik

    Hey

    Hey
    • Ugarik
    • Profile post comment
  7. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    The formula becomes unusable when its derivitive goes negative. It happens a bit earlier
  8. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    No, it uses density of hydrogen at normal pressure and temperature which is okay. My point is that at some point the gap between the final and the initial volume of hybrogen starts shrinking.
  9. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    I'm sorry but this formula simply doesn't work as a remplacement for black hole creation. It calculates work from change of volume. The problem is that initial volume is calculated from mass and density while final one uses schwarzschild radius. The bigger gap between those two the more work it...
  10. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    Nevermind. I figured it out
  11. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    Well yes, this is litteraly what I said. Yeah, I messed that one up I admit E = -V1 ∫V2(K*V^-γ)*dV I don't get this part at all
  12. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    There is probably something wrong with the formula. I left a reply in your blog
  13. Ugarik

    New Black Hole Creation Feat Formula Proposal

    So in conclusion we need formula for adiobatic compression of hydrogen that takes gravity into account?
  14. Ugarik

    Significance of history and destructive potential in a certain level of forces

    It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?
  15. Ugarik

    Significance of history and destructive potential in a certain level of forces

    I agree with Clover about the AP part. Moreover even if the assume that outliers can occur frequently as long as they are of a similar nature it would be very difficult to make up a consistend rule to exclude them from powerscaling
See more
Back
Top