• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Recent content by Kulf_Boba

  1. Kulf_Boba

    DBS Manga Cosmology Rework (Downgrade)

    It’s funny how when the DB thread involves a downgrade, they seem to sweep the thread under the rug.
  2. Kulf_Boba

    Do Branched Timelines Count as Low 2-C?

    Under a standard assumption, it's said that each major decision creates a branching or temporal variation, often illustrated with an image like the one I shared above. What level would that correspond to?
  3. Kulf_Boba

    Do Branched Timelines Count as Low 2-C?

    But what happens when we are explicitly shown through a clear representation that these timelines are connected and share the same past?
  4. Kulf_Boba

    Do Branched Timelines Count as Low 2-C?

    Isn't it assumed that, since they are a branch and share the same past, they are part of the same structure? And therefore, they are 2-C Low, especially if an explicit branch is represented by a main timeline and other lines that diverge from it. I want to know if, by default, it would be 2-C...
  5. Kulf_Boba

    Do Branched Timelines Count as Low 2-C?

    I have a question: if there's a single timeline or space-time continuum that features branches—whether finite or infinite—would this structure still be classified as Low 2-C? Does there need to be clear evidence that these alternate timelines are completely separate from each other for the...
  6. Kulf_Boba

    Rework Angsizing Formula (This affects your favorite verse!!!)

    I’d say go ahead and close it. I don’t intend to contribute any further to this proposal due to the attention it has received. However, if someone wants to revisit it in the future, this is everything I have proposed or intended to propose: Film and TV: For live-action and animated...
  7. Kulf_Boba

    Calculation Evaluations (New forum)

    Priority: 1 Verse: Invincible (Comic) Feat: Destruction of Viltrum (Recalc)
  8. Kulf_Boba

    Quite the stellar DB addition

    I was going to respond to everything, but it would be unnecessary, as my arguments would get lost among so many walls of text and not receive the proper attention. Therefore, I will choose to omit what I consider supporting arguments and focus directly on the key points that support my idea...
  9. Kulf_Boba

    Quite the stellar DB addition

    The problem with that argument is that Occam's Razor is not being applied correctly here. Occam's Razor suggests that, among multiple explanations, the simplest one with the fewest assumptions is the most likely. But assuming that any celestial body around Namek is automatically a sun is...
  10. Kulf_Boba

    Quite the stellar DB addition

    1. I never said there were exactly three moons. 2. The moons have been drawn with characteristic lunar details and orbit close to Namek, just like other natural satellites in the manga. Even after the statement about the three suns, they continue to be depicted with these details even more...
  11. Kulf_Boba

    Quite the stellar DB addition

    Have you reviewed the arguments I have previously presented? It's really not a close possibility that Namek is larger than its suns.
  12. Kulf_Boba

    Quite the stellar DB addition

    Summary of My Arguments: Visual Consistency: The objects near Namek are consistently represented as white circles, as well as with visible details on their surfaces, similar to other moons in the series. Furthermore, their behavior is also consistent with that of moons. This makes it reasonable...
  13. Kulf_Boba

    Quite the stellar DB addition

    That is not a valid argument to prove that Namek is truly larger than its three suns, as the same scenario would occur even if it weren’t. In fact, this detail helps demonstrate that Namek has moons orbiting around it. You yourself mentioned, and Dende confirmed in the anime, that there must...
  14. Kulf_Boba

    Quite the stellar DB addition

    The argument suggesting that Namek is larger than its three suns is based on two main points: It was explicitly stated that Namek has three suns. In the illustrations, three white circles are depicted orbiting the planet. However, in the manga, planetary moons are often drawn in the same way...
Back
Top