This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I've also seen other forums have the mods manually recognize what some users have done, and under some consistent criteria, grant them images to display on their profile that can only be done so (aka, earned) in this manner, this also doubles as something that can be added to a curriculum vitae.
The site should really implement some benefits for users to do stuff for it, like allowing to get the Patreon benefits by doing stuff besides paying money, it's clear that a mere "thanks" isn't doing the cut anymore.
What about Telekinesis on that regard then, in particular against targets with infinite durability as well? Gotta be comprehensive just in case.
I'm also getting the impression that to pull apart, crush, or other stuff among those lines to characters, a combination of AP and LS is required, is...
I mean, the controversy of AP and LS not correlating has been a topic brought up for years at this point, expanding a bit further to minimize further redundant concerns (namely in terms of how LS and durability interact as far Vs threads and general scaling are concerned) would help reduce...
If we go by what Armorchompy said, it seems we'd need to add another note to the LS page over LS not exactly ignoring durability (especially against characters with infinite or above durability) out of some sorts of compromises regarding physics and consistency for the sake of rating stuff. How...
By definition it's not hax, unless we end up allowing 3-A characters by default become vulnerable to stuff like Class G LS (in the sense of being teared apart).
Thing is that slowly lifting something ends up allowing the usage of more muscle fibers than a mere quick punch would, meaning that more force would be possible to be applied with LS than AP, and by extension there's a relation, I'll remind that this is a currently accepted standard as linked...
Wait, so AP can scale from LS, but not the other way around? May I remind that under the current standards if anything it should be the opposite? It does seem that, as linked over there, the standards seem contradictive, so I'd prefer if we got to some consistent solution, going by the previous...