- 28
- 9
I am a little confused on how to prove a case of reality-fiction transcendence. So far, I have the following premises:
1) The world is portrayed as a fictional medium.
2) The world is viewed as insubstantial/insignificant.
3) Qualitative superiority is not contradicted.
Are these premises sufficient to prove R>F? Do I also need premises for QS (inaccessibility, irreduciblity, and qualitatively different dimensions) or is this implied by the current argument?
1) The world is portrayed as a fictional medium.
2) The world is viewed as insubstantial/insignificant.
3) Qualitative superiority is not contradicted.
Are these premises sufficient to prove R>F? Do I also need premises for QS (inaccessibility, irreduciblity, and qualitatively different dimensions) or is this implied by the current argument?