• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm alright with the revisions; neutral on the scaling for Full Hollow Ichigo tho
 
Everything but full hollow ichigo should be fine to apply then since you've got enough votes, that is unless you want to wait for more
Yeah, I'm just tired today so I'm going to apply the accepted stuff tomorrow, then leave the thread open for more votes regarding Full Hollow Ichigo.
 
Ulquiorra still needs scaling, for the reasons I mentioned on the first page.

Besides that, I think you shouldn't write that his profile is comparable to Zaraki. I'll make a CRT later explaining that Vasto Lord is far superior to this level. For now, it's enough to write that he's a bigger threat than Yammy in his final form for 100% Cien. I've also included scans of this on the first page.
 
Last edited:
why not just apply what's already accepted, it doesn't seem like the other option is going to be accepted?
 
why not just apply what's already accepted, it doesn't seem like the other option is going to be accepted?
Everything that has been accepted is already applied. The only thing left is the Ichigo scaling, which has 3 votes neutral for the alternative scaling and 2 votes neutral for the original scaling, with 1 vote in favor (which I don't think is enough for implementation)
 
Then this should be closed since evidently none of the staff who commented agree with it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top