• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

It's back.
It's also still very incomplete, and very poorly formatted.

Edit: Of note, it lacks references or scans of any kind.
"High Building level"
"Transsonic"
"Large Continent+"
"Super Human" durability

and none of these are abilities

Handled. It seems that User is atleast putting an effort into improving the profile but just clueless about how to make a profile. I instructed him further on his profile.
 
@Yamachiho, do you have any thing to say?
• What he said is true because it's very basic.

• Without a supporter, I'm not suitable. My job is just to find feat, and others don't want to be.

• I've been thinking about updating my profile for a while, but I haven't had the time, and feat are hard to find.
 
Hate to do this to Michael but...


This profile is highlighting stats of the character within a (joke) fictional setting of the actual verse itself. Idk if this is allowed exactly but its the first i'm seeing of it. Theres calcs and stuff but they quite literally arent real feats because they take place in the film they all directed?
Feels more like something to be transferred to the Joke Battles wiki
Bump
 

Character is from a youtube shorts video (not a verse) and its stat justifications dont go beyond 'is an adult' and 'can make people blow up'. We're really just making pages on anything here
That's bare bones, but we don't typically remove pages for unimpressive stats and the like. It can be removed for insufficient notability and for lacking references, if those are true. It has references, so notability is the issue I can see coming up here.
 
I mean its references literally come from one Youtube Shorts video so its w/e but idk why we even let this level of page fly anymore. Its obv not about 'unimpressive' stats but we really dont gotta force ourselves with 'is an adult' atpp.

Where were the standards located for viable verses on this site again?
 
I mean its references literally come from one Youtube Shorts video so its w/e but idk why we even let this level of page fly anymore. Its obv not about 'unimpressive' stats but we really dont gotta force ourselves with 'is an adult' atpp.

Where were the standards located for viable verses on this site again?
here
Do we not think views on a Youtube Short (and Tiktok for that matter) differ completely from an actual Youtube internet series or something? Cause they really do and the standards are so much lower.
I mean, I agree we should probably have standards on that (in fact, there's an ongoing staff discussion on it), but as it stands, any video with over 1 million views is viable for indexing, short or long-form, so there's no current reason to delete the profile based on that
 
What sort of thing did you want to add to it, if I may ask?
my two cents on the topic. And to hopefully restart the conversation cause Idk why the wiki is allowing profiles of stuff like a one-off Youtube short or pages of a dude behind a Tiktok green screen filter as legitimate verses just because algorithms give them free views overtime.
 
Last edited:
my two cents on the topic. And to hopefully restart the conversation cause Idk why the wiki is allowing profiles of stuff like a one-off Youtube short or pages of a dude behind a Tiktok green screen filter as legitimate verses just because algorithms give them free views overtime.
I do get it. A YouTube short does get more views than a proper video too, so this does warrant a look. Overall the focus is on a specific view count because they need an objective standard.
 
Back
Top