• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Is this enough for paraconsistency type 3 #sololeveling

And what is paraconsistency hax?
Its this
It just makes it really hard to interact with a character.
 
So i just posted my thoughts about the Sung Jin-Woo page and where he should be tiered as of Solo Leveling: Ragnarok in his thread. I did give my reasonings and used your fandom’s tiering system to gauge the levels of the threats he has faced, and are still facing, to this day.

It would be the second most recent reply on the Sung Jin-Woo thread here
 
So i just posted my thoughts about the Sung Jin-Woo page and where he should be tiered as of Solo Leveling: Ragnarok in his thread. I did give my reasonings and used your fandom’s tiering system to gauge the levels of the threats he has faced, and are still facing, to this day.

It would be the second most recent reply on the Sung Jin-Woo thread here
Now I hear you but this doesnt give an opinion on this hax thread and honestly details the qna.
 
Can you further elaborate please?
The qna is here because im tryna get opinions on if this hax is ok enough to then bring to a revision thread.

What you're doing is bringing up scaling stuff from another thread which doesnt logically follow whats being asked here as something thats completely different.
 
The qna is here because im tryna get opinions on if this hax is ok enough to then bring to a revision thread.

What you're doing is bringing up scaling stuff from another thread which doesnt logically follow whats being asked here as something thats completely different.
Oh, when I saw your reply and the link to this thread in the other one, I thought you wanted to discuss it here. My bad
 
Oh, when I saw your reply and the link to this thread in the other one, I thought you wanted to discuss it here. My bad
You're good I just brought it their cause its a solo discussion thread. This being something else entirely if you wanna discuss about scaling though feel free to dm we can converse back amd forth
 
I think rather than asking whether it's enough for type 3 paraconsistent phys, maybe making a QnA thread finding out more about paraconsistent physiology in general would probably be a better way to go about this
 
I think rather than asking whether it's enough for type 3 paraconsistent phys, maybe making a QnA thread finding out more about paraconsistent physiology in general would probably be a better way to go about this
I just dont really see what I would be missing, nor would I understand what to ask.

As far as I understand type 1 is duality, type 2 is being superior to the dualism by either having both or lacking both and being something completely different and being superior to the dualism in question , hence the sea and itarim/god.

then absolute nothingness remains completely different than all of it as something qualitively different, predating and will remain past everything where it will all return back to it.while everything being identical in nature to it.

Just showing its completely different in nature then the 2 duals(existence and nothingness)(together or neither)systems put in place.
 
I just dont really see what I would be missing, nor would I understand what to ask.

As far as I understand type 1 is duality, type 2 is being superior to the dualism by either having both or lacking both and being something completely different and being superior to the dualism in question , hence the sea and itarim/god.

then absolute nothingness remains completely different than all of it as something qualitively different, predating and will remain past everything where it will all return back to it.while everything being identical in nature to it.

Just showing its completely different in nature then the 2 duals(existence and nothingness)(together or neither)systems put in place.
Just make a crit probs will be more people who will look at it then, you can also as some mods to look at this
 
Back
Top