Killer Peter AP downgrade

[Aksh_sky]

Js remaking ts thread but with a tag because i was asked to do so, but my args remains the same:

I've was just checking out some calcs for refference where i decided to check the currently highest physical calc in the killer peter profile, but while checking up the feat and calc, i found major flaws regarding the pixel scaling of the feat as the pixel values written were just blatently wrong.

I'm talking about this feat particularly(you can check it's comments for the debunk I've provided), which should be downgraded to wall level according to my recalc that one of the CGM has accepted after revaluating the previous one.

So, i am here to request the removal of this blatently wrong calc from the vsbw profile. And maybe the recalc should be added instead if that works. Regardless though, the feat overall is nowhere near 67kgs of TNT and according to my calcs and various ends, it barely doesn't even get pass wall level. The feat overall has pretty inconsistent dimensions throughout the chapter but even if taking those in consideration, it should either ways get barely around like those 4 to 8 kg ranges.

 

[CatLover313]

I agree, never really agreed the pulv. end and though I feel bad that we can't get an accurate measurement for the entire hole, I rather this calc than just multiply the shape by 2.

 

[Aksh_sky]

I agree, never really agreed the pulv. end and though I feel bad that we can't get an accurate measurement for the entire hole, I rather that than just multiple the shape by 2.

They never used pulv btw? They used frag but just used wrong pixel measurements. Maybe I'll js edit my calc and add x2 but that'd still not get the feat pass wall level.

 

[CatLover313]

They never used pulv btw? They used frag but just used wrong pixel measurements. Maybe I'll js edit my calc and add x2 but that'd still not get the feat pass wall level.

Oops, I read Pulv. on the original calc and thought that was the reason of the major discreptancy. realized it was the pixel calc of the original one which was inaccurate.

 

[Aksh_sky]

Oops, I read Pulv. on the original calc and thought that was the reason of the major discreptancy. realized it was the pixel calc of the original one which was inaccurate.

Alright then, u even provided a more accurate pixel calc if you checked it and even gave valid arguements against it. But ig I'll js wait for the removal if it's gonna happen.

 

[Aksh_sky]

Also, i just noticed this calc. This got suddenly added lwk. Ig the crt won't really downgrade the verse's AP anymore but only would downgrade the calc's feat.

 

[BlackCat]

I feel that the new calculation is incorrect because, based on the result, we cannot measure the width in that way. Therefore, we would need to use the volume of a cylinder instead. However, the old calculation is also wrong. As for how it’s wrong… I’ll explain it in detail again in the new calculation I plan to make in the future, after I finish the work I’m currently doing on the manga.


In conclusion, I do not agree with downgrading this calculation.

 

[Aksh_sky]

I feel that the new calculation is incorrect because, based on the result, we cannot measure the width in that way. Therefore, we would need to use the volume of a cylinder instead. However, the old calculation is also wrong. As for how it’s wrong… I’ll explain it in detail again in the new calculation I plan to make in the future, after I finish the work I’m currently doing on the manga.


In conclusion, I do not agree with downgrading this calculation.

My sole purpose for making this crt was not to prove my calculation's validity over the other but rather to point the blatently incorrect pixel values that had been used.

But if you can make it better then sure, go ahead.

 

[Swagment]

Shouldn’t u make a upgrade since Nathaniel AP just got to small building +