"Listen-a-a-ay. Are you alone in that tin box of yours?" (Michael Afton vs The Intruder)

[Greatsage13th]

how would he manage to do that without being able to harm him? the entire thread relied on the intruder ripping michael apart, which is no longer possible.

Just simply putting Michael in a chokehold is good enough. It's just unlikely to happen, hence Michael takes this.

 

[Comiphorous]

Just simply putting Michael in a chokehold is good enough. It's just unlikely to happen, hence Michael takes this.

and that's in character... how? no prior knowledge and by the time he realizes michael is way too immortal it's a bit too late for that and he'd be getting his skull stomped in.

 

[Greatsage13th]

and that's in character... how?

The first thing he does is choke the protagonist to death the moment he breaks in. Same same, but different.

no prior knowledge and by the time he realizes michael is way too immortal it's a bit too late for that and he'd be getting his skull stomped in.

It's still Michael's win anyways regardless, it's just not a stomp hence the match should not be removed unless Superfek has absolutely zero viable wincons.

 

[Comiphorous]

It's still Michael's win anyways regardless, it's just not a stomp hence the match should not be removed unless Superfek has absolutely zero viable wincons.

the conditions changed. matches are removed if the profiles are updated with new notable information, not only if the match becomes a stomp.

 

[Greatsage13th]

the conditions changed. matches are removed if the profiles are updated with new notable information, not only if the match becomes a stomp.

If that was the case, Sans would have a lot of his matches removed from years ago.

Point is, unless the changes would substantially change the tide of a fight to the opponents or the opponent's opponents favour, the match would remain there.

In this case, the profiles have changed, wincons remains the same. So, the match need not be removed.

 

[Comiphorous]

If that was the case, Sans would have a lot of his matches removed from years ago.

he did. he's lost many matches.

Point is, unless the changes would substantially change the tide of a fight to the opponents or the opponent's opponents favour, the match would remain there.

In this case, the profiles have changed, wincons remains the same. So, the match need not be removed.

having literal stone wall durability which makes it so the intruder literally cannot harm Michael anymore is a substantial change.

It was rightfully removed once Michael got upgraded, as a lot of the arguments in this thread spoke about the intruder harming michael. the argument is different now, so it should be removed.

 

[ShionAH]

having literal stone wall durability which makes it so the intruder literally cannot harm Michael anymore is a substantial change.

Why wouldnt the LS advantage still let him dismember.

 

[AppleMaker]

Why wouldnt the LS advantage still let him dismember.

You need comparable durability/attack potency to brutalize someone with LS. When LS is all you have - you can only immobilize or choke your enemy and that's it

 

[Comiphorous]

Why wouldnt the LS advantage still let him dismember.

Correct me if i'm wrong but LS isn't durability negation last i checked. even if he has superior LS it doesn't let him bypass Michael's 207x advantage in durability.

 

[Greatsage13th]

having literal stone wall durability which makes it so the intruder literally cannot harm Michael anymore is a substantial change.

It was rightfully removed once Michael got upgraded, as a lot of the arguments in this thread spoke about the intruder harming michael. the argument is different now, so it should be removed.

The only argument that remained valid in this thread was the fact that Superfek can incap with superior LS, which works regardless of how high the durability that Michael has since it outright does not require Superfek to damage Michael.